He's back! Armstrong crushes field in first time trial.

Discussion in 'Professional Cycling' started by No_Positives, Nov 2, 2008.

  1. RdBiker

    RdBiker New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't bash the kits. They were designed my Vino's mother.
     


  2. RdBiker

    RdBiker New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2005
    Messages:
    403
    Likes Received:
    0
    EDIT: Double post...

    Let's write something new here:
    This win was probably good for Armstrong's self esteem. A win is always a win. It will be interesting to see what his fitness is in a Pro-level race, or in a Pro-level TT. Then we'll see if his pair (it was a TTT right?) was holding him back or not.
     
  3. 9.8mps2

    9.8mps2 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2006
    Messages:
    106
    Likes Received:
    0
    You guys are a tough crowd . It was two days of primo weather and a nice course along the Guadalupe River . I figure if HWNMNBM raises a little cycling awareness and helps one Billy Bubba look out for riders rather than see them as a target we all win . I thought he was riding for UPS though - the kit has a dark brown cast to it .
     
  4. Geoff Vadar

    Geoff Vadar New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2008
    Messages:
    1,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    You can only read so many science fiction novels in a row. After which its back to porn.
     
  5. cynic

    cynic New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    He's taking EPO at altitude?
     
  6. Andrija

    Andrija Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    Not just EPO...
    And not just at altitude.
     
  7. earth_dweller

    earth_dweller New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    1,814
    Likes Received:
    0
    yeah I wonder what wonder drug he's found. He has to be sure that he won't be nailed by a test, so is it a new generation EPO, HGH, or....?
     
  8. Andrija

    Andrija Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    I'm convinced it's something about gene doping... And I'm convinced he's not newbie in it.
     
  9. No_Positives

    No_Positives New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    1
    I'm convinced it's something about him being better than everyone else. And I'm convinced it will continue.
     
  10. Andrija

    Andrija Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2005
    Messages:
    1,654
    Likes Received:
    5
    He sure is, my Negative(s) friend (that's equal to No_Positives, isn't it?).
    He must be better than others if he's (was) the best. The problem is - he was better than proven doped field and now he wants to be better than competition which we all doubt is clean. That makes him (pretty much) better than everyone else in doping.
     
  11. cynic

    cynic New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's so nice to see that you're still in love with your man, so many of these things don't last.
     
  12. poulidor

    poulidor New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Messages:
    1,464
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sure he is the best liar but only in cycling field. He has been beaten by G. W Bush who make the biggest lie of the recent history with WMD!

    Wonderfull Texans!
     
  13. Ashley.S.Olsen

    Ashley.S.Olsen New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    the true of the LAF: (sauce uinkmown)

    Firstly, despite the claims of some, the LAF does not make any significant contribution to the field of cancer research. Of the 270 million US dollars the LAF has raised, just 19.1 million has gone to cancer research. This is a mere drop in the ocean of the billion dollar world of cancer research.

    Secondly the LAF does not directly save lives by paying for cancer treatment. In fact, the LAF says that it`s primary aim is to: `help you understand what to expect, teach you what questions to ask and give you one-on-one support along the way. We help you learn about your treatment options`.

    Many would argue that Armstrong could help cancer sufferers far more by persuading his corporate and Republican buddies to support the provision of universal health care in the USA.

    Thirdly, the LAF is not on the list of charities approved by charity watchdog organisations, largely because it spends so much of what it receives on promoting the LAF. Of the 270 million dollars it has raised, a whopping 45% has gone on promoting the LAF. (And so, of course, Lance Armstrong). See
    http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/cancer.html

    Figures such as those above must cause one to wonder whether the true purpose of the LAF is to provide Armstrong with a PR shield which acts to deflect criticism as to how he achieved his Tour `wins`. Stephanie McIlvain (his former personal liaison with Oakley) certainly seems to believe this, as she made clear in that talk she had with Greg Lemond. (The one where she also admits that she heard Armstrong admit to doping). See:
    http://j.b5z.net/i/u/2132106/m/gregstef.mp3

    Fourthly, foundations are not always created for genuinely philanthropic reasons. The sports philanthropy project says the following of foundations created in the names of sports stars:
    `Foundations... serve two immediate purposes: They can provide a hefty and long-term tax deduction on windfall signing bonuses and salaries. And they can supply positive public relations, if they flourish.

    ...On its own Web site, the National Heritage Foundation lists several reasons why agents should encourage their clients to start foundations. For one thing, agents may continue to be paid from the foundation after the athletes' retirement. Also listed: Community prestige, lower taxable income and the Pester Factor.
    "Athletes are besieged with requests for funds by almost everyone they see," the site offers. "They would be able to say, 'All these matters are handled by my foundation.'"
    On the 990 tax forms, charity for the wrong reason still counts as a write-off.`
    http://www.sportsphilanthropyproject.com/resources/details.php?id=426

    Of course, Armstrong is not alone in his `good work`. Others who operate similar PR scams, sorry, who are involved in similar work for good causes, include Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton...
    http://www.floydlandisfoundation.org/

    http://www.tylerhamilton.com/
     
  14. Ashley.S.Olsen

    Ashley.S.Olsen New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2008
    Messages:
    53
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Lance Armstrong Foundation (LAF), founded by the champion bicyclist and cancer survivor of the same name, is celebrating its 10-year anniversary this year. Wouldn’t you think a charity that receives massive publicity for having one of the most popular causes and most admired celebrities as the face of the organization would be able to easily raise lots of money? Unfortunately this is not the case. LAF spent as much as $45 to raise each $100, exceeding AIP’s 35% recommended fundraising ceiling by a significant margin. While LAF had difficulty raising contributions efficiently, it did prove to be a savvy merchandise marketer. LAF sold over $24 million in merchandise, including the ubiquitous yellow “LIVESTRONG” wristband, as well as clothing, sports gear and even dog leashes. Yet after spending $10 million in solicitation costs, the group brought in only $22 million in contributions, according to AIP’s analysis of LAF’s 2005 financial statements.
     
Loading...
Loading...