Yojimbo_ said:Gents.
Perhaps you should re-read the article that was included in the first post in this thread and explain to me how that does not qualify as hearsay. Other than Landis, there are no names attached to any of the comments being made - all there is are references to remarks by unidentified riders who wish to remain anonymous. If that isn't hearsay I don't know what is.
Show me some first person evidence, and tell me who the first persons are who are giving that evidence. Other than Landis and what he's said, I still haven't heard anything concrete and I don't think you have either. And until there is something like that, it's still all hearsay whether you like it or not.
...who the hell cares about you? this is 1st person "evidence" in a federal grand jury... and not hersay.. that's what we were all talking about here.. i like how these idiots on internet forums, when shown to be complete morons and totally wrong try to twist and turn the conversation to try to not look so stupid..
perhaps you should re-read YOUR post? look at what YOU say in YOUR post.. "uncorroborated hearsay testimony".. so what.. the rider is somehow giving "testimony" (your words) to YOU? to us, on Cycling Forums? ..you convened your own federal grand jury? you are obviously talking about it being hearsay in the federal grand jury.. who do you think you're kidding??
look man, you were shown to not have the foggiest idea what the hell the word hearsay meant.. deal with it! please keep on posting and we'll see just how far you can shove your foot down your throat.. what a dumb ass!