D
Dally
Guest
Donovan Rebbechi wrote:
> On 2006-01-09, Dally <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Depending on your conditioning, this might mean you jog at 4.0 mph for 5
>>minutes, then sprint at 7.0 mph, then walk at 3.0 for 30 seconds, ramp
>>it back up to 4.0 as soon as possible, and then go up to 5.5 before you
>>hit 7.0 again.
>
>
> Please don't use 7.0mph and "sprint" in the same sentence (unless 7.0 refers
> to a recovery plod in between sprints!) Even you can "sprint" faster than
> that (I hope!).
Yes, I "sprint" at faster than 7.0. But not much - I've got stumpy legs
and am pitifully slow. But I've also been training for a couple of
years and can run for miles and miles. The OP is walking in between
"sprints". I suspect his conditioning is pretty poor.
I also acknowledge that these aren't sprints. Accelerations might be a
better term.
Dally
> On 2006-01-09, Dally <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Depending on your conditioning, this might mean you jog at 4.0 mph for 5
>>minutes, then sprint at 7.0 mph, then walk at 3.0 for 30 seconds, ramp
>>it back up to 4.0 as soon as possible, and then go up to 5.5 before you
>>hit 7.0 again.
>
>
> Please don't use 7.0mph and "sprint" in the same sentence (unless 7.0 refers
> to a recovery plod in between sprints!) Even you can "sprint" faster than
> that (I hope!).
Yes, I "sprint" at faster than 7.0. But not much - I've got stumpy legs
and am pitifully slow. But I've also been training for a couple of
years and can run for miles and miles. The OP is walking in between
"sprints". I suspect his conditioning is pretty poor.
I also acknowledge that these aren't sprints. Accelerations might be a
better term.
Dally