B
BrettM
Guest
"Peter Signorini" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
>
> Once you're on a roundabout, behaving as a vehicle, which is what the
> law recognises cyclists as, other vehicles must give way to you.
> Period.
>
The point I'm trying to make Peter is that this is not strictly true.
The reason I mentioned s.253 is that it appears to apply regardless of
other rules (it is in a separate division with the title "Additional
Rules for Cyclists").
What that means is that you need to apply all of the other rules but if
you cause a traffic hazard in doing so you will be at fault. That seems
very harsh but it basically means it is your duty to avoid an accident
(which kind of makes sense).
I don't know of the law being applied and I would probably try to defend
against it's application on the basis that it was contradictory and
without clear purpose but it is still there.
Cheers
BrettM
news:[email protected]:
>
> Once you're on a roundabout, behaving as a vehicle, which is what the
> law recognises cyclists as, other vehicles must give way to you.
> Period.
>
The point I'm trying to make Peter is that this is not strictly true.
The reason I mentioned s.253 is that it appears to apply regardless of
other rules (it is in a separate division with the title "Additional
Rules for Cyclists").
What that means is that you need to apply all of the other rules but if
you cause a traffic hazard in doing so you will be at fault. That seems
very harsh but it basically means it is your duty to avoid an accident
(which kind of makes sense).
I don't know of the law being applied and I would probably try to defend
against it's application on the basis that it was contradictory and
without clear purpose but it is still there.
Cheers
BrettM