Canzures said:that is very unfortunate....I feel for the riders and their families, especially the one that died....makes me wonder how something like this happens and there is no vigilante justice done especially from someone that presents himself as being inibriated or worse high in cocaine or some other drug...he should have been dragged and given a whopping of his life...just my humble opinion.
I agree. The only caveat is that it's always possible that the driver had a seizure or heart attack, or some other medical event that caused the crash. But if I were at such a scene, and knew that there was no such excuse, I'd be happy to join in killing him (if I thought we could get away with it).Canzures said:that is very unfortunate....I feel for the riders and their families, especially the one that died....makes me wonder how something like this happens and there is no vigilante justice done especially from someone that presents himself as being inibriated or worse high in cocaine or some other drug...he should have been dragged and given a whopping of his life...just my humble opinion.
Whatever happened to the philosopher in you dude? To meet violence with violence is useless.Pendejo said:I agree. The only caveat is that it's always possible that the driver had a seizure or heart attack, or some other medical event that caused the crash. But if I were at such a scene, and knew that there was no such excuse, I'd be happy to join in killing him (if I thought we could get away with it).
Crankyfeet said:Holy ****... there are some vigilante cowboys still in this country...Let's form a posse. And we'll torture him as well first. I think a beheading would be good. But with a rusty blunt pen-knife.
Jeepers guys... the guy didn't go out driving that day on a mission to plough head-on into a group of cyclists. And even if by some bizarre fluke.. he did... what would killing him prove or achieve?
...yet satisfying.TheDarkLord said:Whatever happened to the philosopher in you dude? To meet violence with violence is useless.
Why don't we kill all intoxicated drivers?... Cause whether you hit someone and kill them inadvertently while driving under the influence is only a question of how the dice fall...Canzures said:hmm, if that driver was intoxicated and then got behind the wheel, chances are increased with him killing someone behind the wheel. this happenedin Mexico but also happens everywhere else. I believe that is whats wrong with the world, especially in the USA. the laws are too not harsh enough and varies from state to state. it would do the country alot of good if laws regarding an eye for an eye are enacted for manslaughter, not do 10, 15, 20 years and are free to go....
remember the beltway sniper in the dc metro area a few years ago, well they are still alive sucking up our tax dollars. kill them already
The meaning of the word "justice" in the US especially seems to be heavily connected to "revenge". The punishment of the guilty seems to revolve around the family of the victim getting some satisfaction from causing mirror pain to the assailant.Chavez said:...yet satisfying.
Farmguy said:To quote a Judge from Nevada........
" the Death penalty has worked every time it has been applied, Never a repeat offender "
Farmguy said:To quote a Judge from Nevada........
" the Death penalty has worked every time it has been applied, Never a repeat offender "
Canzures said:+1
if capital punishment was used more often if it would certainly make an impact.