David Martin <
[email protected]> wrote in message news:<BCEF7D4E.1782D%
[email protected]>...
> On 11/6/04 3:12 pm, in article
[email protected],
> "JohnB" <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > However, I think the issue should be more along the
> > lines of it allowing them to do their bit to make
> > cyclists safer, without cyclists having to have working
> > brakes.
>
> Or looking where they are going..
>
> ..d
It might be the case that the family are misguidedly doing
something they think will help other cyclists because they
feel some guilt for the boy being killed whilst riding an
unsafe bike without a helmet. They are however doing the
least helpful thing by giving cash to Behit. A more helpful
approach might be to use cash raised to pay a bike mechanic
and have regular free bike checks carried out at local town
centres. I believe many kids bikes are not maintained well
if at all as non-cyclists are used to cars with annual
service periods. I have first hand knowledge of 2 child
cycle road accidents. One caused by brakes so badly out of
adjustment that the blocks almost missed the rims altogether
(compounded by the teenager riding off the pavement into the
road without looking). The girl hit the side of a passing
car with only minor bruises. The second a serious head
injury when a teenager lost control on a steep downhill due
to the poorly maintained brakes and hit a tree. I know this
is anectdotal but it is common sense that an accident
prevented is better than mitigating (or not) the
consequences of an accident. Iain C