"Stan Cox" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<
[email protected]>...
> <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > Can't decide between the two. Price aside, many differences?
>
> On the bizarre off chance that this is genuine I will give a serious answer
>
>
> How does this entry level Ford compare to a Ferrari
>
> Stan Cox
Stan, et al:
Actually, while the difference in quality is very significant, your response does not actually
address the differences. A Ferrari will differ from an entry level car in that it will be
essentially a lot faster and will have comfort differences that will also be significant.
With components, there is little difference in perceptible overall performance between a low level
group and a high level group. Hence, if a cyclist were to ride a bike with low level components vs.
a high level components he would not notice any significant differences in performance. At the same
time, if a good racer had well tuned RSX components in his bike, he will probably do just as well in
a race as if he had record components. I have seen, and so has everyone else cyclists with low end
bikes having no problem outperforming cyclists with the best equipment.
This does not mean that there are no differences. Record components will certainly last a lifetime
if properly cared for. RSX components will not last as much. Record components will be significantly
lighter, so a bike with record components will be a lot lighter when you pick it up and it has
record components. Although, this difference will not be that perceptible while riding. Record
components will have a much better finish a would look a lot better to the trained eye.
In essence, record components will last longer, will be lighter and look a lot better. They may
also have a slightly better feel to some. They also cost a lot more. A more acurate analogy would
be between rolex and timex. Rolex has better finish and lasts longer. However, timex will perform
just as well.
Andres