Actually, in the States its been found by the courts, that police or society as a whole, have no responsiblity or obligation to protect an individual from harm. I'm guessing its very similiar in Aussie land. Though I'm not that familiar with the legal and civil systems there.ProfTournesol said:Surely a society that protects a citizen's rights to travel safely without the need to be armed, and certainly to recreate on a bicycle without carrying a gun is desirable. I'd happily trade my 'individual freedom' to be murdered for the obligation for society to offer me that protection.
(I can't wait to visit New Zealand)
Personally I am not willing to trade my individual freedom for safety. This includes freedom of speech, peaceful assembly, etc. Granted there are limits, i.e. not yelling fire in a crowded theater, but you don't muzzle people in a theater because there is the possibility that they may infact do that.
Regardless cheers, I'm off. Love this BBS though. Glad I found it today.