Bit of a random question, but I was thinking of purchasing a new bike to replace my old mountain bike. I was thinking of still using a mountain bike, but I don't want to spend to much, yet still get a quality bike. Quality's everything! Does £300 seem like too much to you guys?
How Much Do People Typically Spend On Their Bikes?
- Thread starter Zackiac
- Start date
I think £300 should be more than enough to get you a quality bike.
I bought mine a while ago from Halfords. I'm fairly sure that I paid around £180 for it when there was a sale on. I've had it a good few years, done many rides on it and it still does me proud.
I bought mine a while ago from Halfords. I'm fairly sure that I paid around £180 for it when there was a sale on. I've had it a good few years, done many rides on it and it still does me proud.
There's no such thing as what one "typically" spends on a bicycle. In the US, quality road bikes start at around $500 USD, which gets you an alloy frame, alloy fork (in most cases) cheap-assed wheels and tires, and an 8 speed drive train. I mean 8 cogs on the rear cassette, not "8 speeds". 10 speed drives, with a carbon fiber fork, and slightly better wheels, start at $1000-$1200. If you want a full carbon fiber frame, they start at around $1800-$2000. As you go up in price, you get better wheels, sometimes a lighter frame, smoother shifting with lighter components, and at around $4500-$5000 you can get electronic shifting. And you can spend twice that if you choose to.
The average decent bike goes for around ZAR 3 500 down here in South Africa. That's roughly $ 300 which seems to be on par with what most folks are paying for their bikes in other parts of the world. There are cheaper bikes available as well but those are mostly aimed at kids and first time cyclists. Those tend to be about half the price but I wouldn't recommend them to anyone that will be cycling on a regular basis. Definitely wouldn't trust them for long commutes, that's for sure.
This is definitely true. There are some really quality used bikes around if you fancy going down that route. My first geared bike was a second-hand one and I loved it. It only came to it's end when I was foolish enough to let a "friend" have a go on it who "ghostied" it into some railings, buckling the handlebars.Keyan said:
MPRE is correct.
There is no typical spend that one could point to.
I guess a persons budget will ultimately determine how much that person can afford to spend.
In terms of bikes and equipment, the old saying "it's not the bike, it's the engine on the bike" which is important.
Regardless of what bike each of us has, we're the engine on that bike.
To the OP, stick to a budget that suits you. Try not to be persuaded to spend more than you can afford.
That would be my advice.
£300 you should be able to get a good bike for that money.
There is no typical spend that one could point to.
I guess a persons budget will ultimately determine how much that person can afford to spend.
In terms of bikes and equipment, the old saying "it's not the bike, it's the engine on the bike" which is important.
Regardless of what bike each of us has, we're the engine on that bike.
To the OP, stick to a budget that suits you. Try not to be persuaded to spend more than you can afford.
That would be my advice.
£300 you should be able to get a good bike for that money.
My first bike is also a used one and I had no problems with it. I decided to take that route because I was not sure during those times whether biking is for me or not so getting something that costs less is the best option. My second bike is a hand me down. A friend did an upgrade on his bike and gave me his old one.Susimi said:
300 pounds is definitely plenty. You should be able to get yourself a quality bike with that amount of money.
if something like this were to happen.Mr. Beanz said:
http://www.fototime.com/ftweb/bin/ft.dll/picture?PictId=%7B4692BF71-2E0D-468A-BB44-360C1B83C59B%7D&size=ORIG
Similar threads
