B
Tom Kunich wrote:
> Let us assume that you set the chance of the intelligence being wrong at
> 75%. If YOU were President could you take the chance that thousands, perhaps
> millions of Americans might be murdered by a madman?
That's not really fair to Bush. It's only thousands, not millions,
that are dying in this war, and he's not really a madman, just
an incompetent.
Ben
P.S.
Even if Saddy the Baddy had had WMD, he wouldn't have been able to
get them to the US. He might have been able to get them to Kuwait,
Saudi Arabia, or Israel, which would have been a valid foreign policy
concern, but it has nothing to do with millions of Americans being
murdered. That's _if_ Saddam had WMD, which he didn't.
> Let us assume that you set the chance of the intelligence being wrong at
> 75%. If YOU were President could you take the chance that thousands, perhaps
> millions of Americans might be murdered by a madman?
That's not really fair to Bush. It's only thousands, not millions,
that are dying in this war, and he's not really a madman, just
an incompetent.
Ben
P.S.
Even if Saddy the Baddy had had WMD, he wouldn't have been able to
get them to the US. He might have been able to get them to Kuwait,
Saudi Arabia, or Israel, which would have been a valid foreign policy
concern, but it has nothing to do with millions of Americans being
murdered. That's _if_ Saddam had WMD, which he didn't.