Disgusting, this makes my blood boil. Where is the deterrent in this sentence? And it's our money
that had to stitch him up after slitting his wrists! I really hope he has to share a cell with an
> The bit that *really* gets me is that he's got previous on road rage,
> driving & speeding. And no mention of a driving ban!!! AAAAAGGGHHHH!!
Think we all need to contact our MP and ask for an explaination as to why he doesn't have a lifetime
driving ban. He's pretty much proved he's not capable of holding on responsibly. Its one thing to
complain to the MP, but I want an explanation.
Ian Rogers 232, Broomhall St Sheffield S3 7SQ UK Mobile. 07789 546509 "dannyfrankszzz"
<[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> For what he did and with previous convictions, it should have been more like four years.
> Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com
I thought that it must be attempted murder - if not that then manslaughter. It seems ridiculous when
that chap about a year ago was given six months for collecting and selling golf balls - a practice
he'd done for years and declared taxes and all the rest. Crazy
"Ian Rogers" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Should have been at least 10 years for attempted murder! Sometimes the Americans do get it right,
> at least when it doesn't get plea bargained out of court.
> I think I also sent a blank message with my address and mobile number to
> group! F*%$*!*% mouse!
> Ian Rogers Sheffield UK
> "dannyfrankszzz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > For what he did and with previous convictions, it should have been more like four years.
> > --
> > >--------------------------<
> > Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com
"Tony W" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> Is it just me or do others find the last sentence somewhat hypocritical?
> In jailing Baxter, Recorder Guy Kearl, QC, said: "....Incidents such as these, appalling as they
> are, will not be tolerated by the courts."
> 2 years seems pretty tolerant to me.
I sometimes think that judges living on a daily diet of the worst of society lose their sense of
I can understand how some motoring offences get to be treated leniently as there is always a
possibility of "there but for.......", but deliberately reversing a vehicle at people hardly
I wonder how the judge would have reacted had the accused deliberately fired a legally possessed
shotgun at the victims?