Hull road rage sentence

[Chalfont]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm

Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.

 

[Simon Proven]

Chalfont wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
>
> Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.

Pathetic. Did you see the bit about previous as well?

 

[Peter B]

"Chalfont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
>
> Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.

Pathetic!

Pete

 

[Wafflycathcsdir]

>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
>>
>> Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.
>
>Pathetic!

The bit that *really* gets me is that he's got previous on road rage, reckless driving & speeding.
And no mention of a driving ban!!! AAAAAGGGHHHH!!

helen s

~~~~~~~~~~
Flush out that intestinal parasite and/or the waste product before sending a reply!

Any speeliong mistake$ aR the resiult of my cats sitting on the keyboaRRRDdd
~~~~~~~~~~

 

[Mr_rolfi]

Disgusting, this makes my blood boil. Where is the deterrent in this sentence? And it's our money
that had to stitch him up after slitting his wrists! I really hope he has to share a cell with an
unsavoury character...

--

cheers,

Dave Rollinson

"Chalfont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
>
> Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.

 

[Johnny Klunk]

> The bit that *really* gets me is that he's got previous on road rage,
reckless
> driving & speeding. And no mention of a driving ban!!! AAAAAGGGHHHH!!
>

Think we all need to contact our MP and ask for an explaination as to why he doesn't have a lifetime
driving ban. He's pretty much proved he's not capable of holding on responsibly. Its one thing to
complain to the MP, but I want an explanation.

 

[Danny Colyer]

mr_rolfi wrote:
> I really hope he has to share a cell with an unsavoury character...

Well, his cellmate certainly will.

--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( http://www.juggler.net/danny ) Recumbent cycle page:
http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/recumbents/ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine

 

[dannyfrankszzz]

For what he did and with previous convictions, it should have been more like four years.

 

[dannyfrankszzz]

With previous and for what he did, he should have got at least 4 years. I can't believe he got off so lightly.

 

[Ian Rogers]

--
Ian Rogers 232, Broomhall St Sheffield S3 7SQ UK Mobile. 07789 546509 "dannyfrankszzz"
<[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> For what he did and with previous convictions, it should have been more like four years.
>
>
>
> --
> >--------------------------<
> Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com

 

[Ian Rogers]

Should have been at least 10 years for attempted murder! Sometimes the Americans do get it right, at
least when it doesn't get plea bargained out of court.

I think I also sent a blank message with my address and mobile number to the group! F*%$*!*% mouse!

Ian
--
Ian Rogers Sheffield UK

"dannyfrankszzz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> For what he did and with previous convictions, it should have been more like four years.
>
>
>
> --
> >--------------------------<
> Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com

 

[Marc]

Chalfont <[email protected]> wrote:

> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
>
> Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.

Who?

 

[Richard Goodman]

"Chalfont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
>
> Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.
>
>

Ridiculous, especially bearing in mind his previous. *******!

Rich

 

[John B]

Richard Goodman wrote:

> "Chalfont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
> >
> > Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.
> >
> >
>
> Ridiculous, especially bearing in mind his previous. *******!
>

I hope you meant Bastards.

Both the deranged driver and the moronic judge.

John B

 

[Mr_rolfi]

I thought that it must be attempted murder - if not that then manslaughter. It seems ridiculous when
that chap about a year ago was given six months for collecting and selling golf balls - a practice
he'd done for years and declared taxes and all the rest. Crazy

--

cheers,

Dave Rollinson

"Ian Rogers" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Should have been at least 10 years for attempted murder! Sometimes the Americans do get it right,
> at least when it doesn't get plea bargained out of court.
>
> I think I also sent a blank message with my address and mobile number to
the
> group! F*%$*!*% mouse!
>
> Ian
> --
> Ian Rogers Sheffield UK
>
> "dannyfrankszzz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > For what he did and with previous convictions, it should have been more like four years.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > >--------------------------<
> > Posted via cyclingforums.com http://www.cyclingforums.com

 

[Tony W]

"Richard Goodman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Chalfont" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/2869009.stm
> >
> > Only two years. Out in one if he behaves.
> >
> >
>
> Ridiculous, especially bearing in mind his previous. *******!

Is it just me or do others find the last sentence somewhat hypocritical?

In jailing Baxter, Recorder Guy Kearl, QC, said: "....Incidents such as these, appalling as they
are, will not be tolerated by the courts."

2 years seems pretty tolerant to me.

T

 

[Tim Woodall]

On Fri, 21 Mar 2003 09:57:24 -0000, Tony W <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is it just me or do others find the last sentence somewhat hypocritical?
>
I don't understand the last sentence.

> In jailing Baxter, Recorder Guy Kearl, QC, said: "....Incidents such as these, appalling as they
> are, will not be tolerated by the courts."
>

ISTM that appalling should read unusual, or is the judge suggesting that if you commit a
sufficiently appalling crime then you will get of scott free? Just this driver wasn't
sufficiently bad?

Tim.

--
God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = - @B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.

http://tjw.hn.org/ http://www.locofungus.btinternet.co.uk/

 

[Peter B]

"Tony W" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Is it just me or do others find the last sentence somewhat hypocritical?
>
> In jailing Baxter, Recorder Guy Kearl, QC, said: "....Incidents such as these, appalling as they
> are, will not be tolerated by the courts."
>
> 2 years seems pretty tolerant to me.

I sometimes think that judges living on a daily diet of the worst of society lose their sense of
perspective.

I can understand how some motoring offences get to be treated leniently as there is always a
possibility of "there but for.......", but deliberately reversing a vehicle at people hardly
qualifies.

I wonder how the judge would have reacted had the accused deliberately fired a legally possessed
shotgun at the victims?

Pete

 

[Peter B]

"Peter B" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> I wonder how the judge would have reacted had the accused deliberately
fired
> a legally possessed shotgun at the victims?

I bet he wouldn't be allowed another shotgun licence but the scumbag in question will almost
certainly be allowed his driving licence back.

Pete.