General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion

Hyperlink legality (was: some typical pissing match above)

Started by Brian Link · · Last activity · 5 posts · 335 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
General fitness, health and nutrition
Published
1 February 2005
Last activity
2 February 2005
Original author
Brian Link
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
335
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. I read about 80% of the huge threads above and didn't see this
    mentioned, but here's a recent court case dealing with a similar
    topic.

    http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1D125F5A

    And of course there's the infamous DECSS encryption-link fight.. one
    summary here

    http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/main.html

    And another here (equally infamous 2600 magazine hyperlink Froohaha).

    http://www.mpaa.org/Press/Hyperlink_FAQ.htm

    Bottom line, currently it doesn't appear to be illegal to link to
    other information on the web. It's a web, not a filament. If it were
    to become illegal, the web as we know it would vanish.

    That being said, it's generally rude to link to someone else's content
    without at least attribution. And if requested to remove it, rude to
    leave it up. But not litigable (well, I spose 'bout anything is
    litigable. Freedom isn't free, you know.. )

    Now of course, sometimes you WANT to be rude...

    BLink

  2. Brian Link said:


    Bottom line, currently it doesn't appear to be illegal to link to
    other information on the web. It's a web, not a filament. If it were
    to become illegal, the web as we know it would vanish.

    Especially Google.

    Quoted message said:


    That being said, it's generally rude to link to someone else's content
    without at least attribution. And if requested to remove it, rude to
    leave it up. But not litigable (well, I spose 'bout anything is
    litigable. Freedom isn't free, you know.. )

    I don't think it's rude to link to it but to just take it and put it
    on your own site would be rude at the very least.
    Assuming you find unattributed plagiarism rude that is.

    Quoted message said:


    Now of course, sometimes you WANT to be rude...

    BLink

    --
    Bob Mann
    Help save trees. Wipe your ass with an owl.

  3. Brian Link <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I read about 80% of the huge threads above and didn't see this
    mentioned, but here's a recent court case dealing with a similar
    topic.

    http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1D125F5A

    And of course there's the infamous DECSS encryption-link fight.. one
    summary here

    http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/main.html

    And another here (equally infamous 2600 magazine hyperlink Froohaha).

    http://www.mpaa.org/Press/Hyperlink_FAQ.htm

    Bottom line, currently it doesn't appear to be illegal to link to
    other information on the web. It's a web, not a filament. If it were
    to become illegal, the web as we know it would vanish.

    That being said, it's generally rude to link to someone else's content
    without at least attribution. And if requested to remove it, rude to
    leave it up. But not litigable (well, I spose 'bout anything is
    litigable. Freedom isn't free, you know.. )

    Now of course, sometimes you WANT to be rude...

    BLink

    You're confusing posting a link to another site and arranging for that
    site's content to appear as part of your site (through an <img> link or
    something more complicated). The first (despite Ticketron) is pretty clearly
    both legal and okay; the second isn't.

    Hugh

    --
    Run like hell and let the clowns deal with the bull.

  4. Hugh Beyer said:

    Brian Link <[email hidden]> wrote in
    news:[email hidden]:

    Quoted message said:

    I read about 80% of the huge threads above and didn't see this
    mentioned, but here's a recent court case dealing with a similar
    topic.

    http://makeashorterlink.com/?X1D125F5A

    And of course there's the infamous DECSS encryption-link fight.. one
    summary here

    http://www.lemuria.org/DeCSS/main.html

    And another here (equally infamous 2600 magazine hyperlink Froohaha).

    http://www.mpaa.org/Press/Hyperlink_FAQ.htm

    Bottom line, currently it doesn't appear to be illegal to link to
    other information on the web. It's a web, not a filament. If it were
    to become illegal, the web as we know it would vanish.

    That being said, it's generally rude to link to someone else's content
    without at least attribution. And if requested to remove it, rude to
    leave it up. But not litigable (well, I spose 'bout anything is
    litigable. Freedom isn't free, you know.. )

    Now of course, sometimes you WANT to be rude...

    BLink

    You're confusing posting a link to another site and arranging for that
    site's content to appear as part of your site (through an <img> link or
    something more complicated). The first (despite Ticketron) is pretty clearly
    both legal and okay; the second isn't.

    Slippery johnny williams please note!!

  5. "Brian Link" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
    news:[email hidden]...

    Quoted message said:


    Bottom line, currently it doesn't appear to be illegal to link to
    other information on the web. It's a web, not a filament. If it were
    to become illegal, the web as we know it would vanish.

    That being said, it's generally rude to link to someone else's content
    without at least attribution. And if requested to remove it, rude to
    leave it up. But not litigable (well, I spose 'bout anything is
    litigable. Freedom isn't free, you know.. )


    Yeah, it costs about a buck 05.

    Not really related, but still in the ballpark:
    'MP3 links breach copyright, says Norwegian court'
    http://www.out-law.com/php/page.php?page_id=mplinksbreachcop1107172121&area=news

    -Ben

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.