Hypothetic question



Status
Not open for further replies.
Geraint Jones wrote:

> Are you suggesting that there would be little or no chance of the occasional impressionable child
> of the death greenhouse tribe being seduced by the bronzed thighs of a cyclist?

Half bronzed, half white thighs you mean :)

--
Guy
===
I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.

http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/09.shtml#103 http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/09.shtml#104
 
"Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Geraint Jones wrote:
< > Are you suggesting that there would be little or no chance of
> > the occasional impressionable child of the death greenhouse
< > tribe being seduced by the bronzed thighs of a cyclist?
>
< Half bronzed, half white thighs you mean :)

I knew there had to be a disadvantage to riding a recumblent.
 
Geraint Jones wrote:
> "Just zis Guy, you know?" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Geraint Jones wrote:
> < > Are you suggesting that there would be little or no chance of
>> > the occasional impressionable child of the death greenhouse
> < > tribe being seduced by the bronzed thighs of a cyclist?
>>
> < Half bronzed, half white thighs you mean :)
>
> I knew there had to be a disadvantage to riding a recumblent.

Nope - that's a disadvantage of wearing bike shorts, based on experience. On a 'bent you can wear
any shorts you like - or none if you must ;-)

Also, on a 'bent you get to brown the bits of your front which are in the shade when riding out on a
Sunday on the wedgie :)

--
Guy
===
I wonder if you wouldn't mind piecing out our imperfections with your thoughts; and while you're
about it perhaps you could think when we talk of bicycles, that you see them printing their proud
wheels i' the receiving earth; thanks awfully.

http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/09.shtml#103 http://www.highwaycode.gov.uk/09.shtml#104
 
FortyEight16 wrote:
> A question I've always wanted answered by a creationist: "Given that Eve was only created after
> god saw that Adam needed a partner, were Adam's genitals retro-fitted?"

You mean once upon a time Action Man might have been anatomically accurate? I dont think so. Surely
God, being omniscient, would have known that in the far distant future there would be websites which
Adam's descendants would feel the need for genitals when viewing.

Er, I mean, being omniscient, God knew that Adam would eventually come to need a partner, he was
just testing to see how long Adam would take to work it out. Yes, that's right. Nothing to do with
websites at all.

--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( http://www.juggler.net/danny ) Recumbent cycle page:
http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/recumbents/ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine
 
Guy wrote:
> Nope - that's a disadvantage of wearing bike shorts, based on experience. On a 'bent you can wear
> any shorts you like - or none if you must ;-)

Of course, on a bent the exposure deemed by some as indecent would be much more significant than on
a wedgie. I wonder just how far you'd get before being pulled by the police (damn I could have
worded that better...)

> Also, on a 'bent you get to brown the bits of your front which are in the shade when riding out on
> a Sunday on the wedgie :)

Yeah, but on a bent you never get to brown the backs of your legs :-(

Maybe I should fit reflectors on my lowrider rack to reflect the sunlight onto the backs of
my legs :)

--
Danny Colyer (remove safety to reply) ( http://www.juggler.net/danny ) Recumbent cycle page:
http://www.speedy5.freeserve.co.uk/recumbents/ "He who dares not offend cannot be honest." -
Thomas Paine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.