Quoted message said:it's amazing how someone so educated can be so stupid. Meb &
Radcliffe...wear these knee high socks in races, marathons, etc...as
these socks they believe had some blood circulatory benefit when racing
or whatever. How do you feel about those socks Donnie? Why don't you
wear them? If your view is different than Meb's and Paula's....are
"you right" and they're wrong? Will you allow them to have contrary
notions than yours?
Sure. But last I checked, Paula Radcliffe didn't attribute her success primarily
to her socks. You can have a view on these things one way or another, but I
think most of these athletes, and most of the good coaches would attrinute most
of their success to training.
The Jack Daniels book profiles a number of athletes, and all of them attribute
their success to various aspects of their training.
Quoted message said:What about nasal strips Donovan? I can name you numerous elite
athletes who wear them free of any endorsement contract. Now I may not
buy into them....but I am not so stupid, arrogant, and pompous to
dismiss their use for another person. You however are.
Not at all. I don't have an opinion on them either way (but I'd laugh at anyone
who thought that nasal strips were more important than interval work, for
example)
[snip]
Quoted message said:You're not some kind of a "god" that can discern and delineate what's
really the result of another person's performance. Donovan...a myriad
of factors can produce optimum performance in an athlete....factors in
areas that you don't accept.
Some factors are known to make a huge difference. Some aren't. For example, your
running economy will not increase by 10% when you put on a nasal strip.
For an elite athlete, even a 0.1% boost may make the difference between olympic
gold and obscurity, so those guys really care about the possibility of a 0.1%
boost. But they're not going to argue that the 0.1% boost got them into the
lead pack at the end of the race in the first place.
Quoted message said:Be intelligent and mature enough Donovan to allow for the possibility
that things you don't accept for you are effective for another
person...
Truth is not relative. Not all theories have equal merit. Some theories are
good -- they have either considerable empirical data supporting them, a
logical theoretical foundation that has its basis in empirical data, or both.
But some theories are just dumb -- they either contradict or ignore a vast
body of accumulated knowledge.
Cheers,
--
Donovan Rebbechi
http://pegasus.rutgers.edu/~elflord/