In the world today, we have had a upsurge of fundamentalism: Muslim fundamentalism, Hindu nationalism, Aum ...whatever that freak in Japan, Tamil Tigers, shooting abortion doctors, etc. In American society, what is the dominent religion. It is not Christianity. Christianity does not define the nature of our dialog. It is science. And the debunker wierdos are the fundamentalists of science and the scientific culture and society. Like all fundamentalists, for them, the ends justify the means. They will use ANY means to achieve their goals. They don't give a fig about anything else. They don't care how big of a lie they tell. They don't care who they hurt. Their standard of morality, like all fundamentalists, is the achievement of their goals, not anything else. And like all fundamentalists, they care more about the culture, society, and symbols of science than they do about the spirit of inquiry and the spirit of science. (Muslims fundamentalists are the same; the spirit of Islam is not of great interest to them; if you have your troops in their holy land or if you support an alleged enemy of Islam, then you are a target.) So, shall we call them debunker fundamentalists, or what? In this forum, I think that it is best to simply ignore them. Perhaps labeling them with a post as debunker fundamentalist would be good. Then people who care about truth and learning can ignore them.