S
SMS
Guest
Michael Press wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> SMS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're wrong there. Many Believers follow that path to this
>>> day.
>>>
>>> http://www.slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/maintenance/chain.html
>>>
>>> Yep, "ferver", that's the right word all right. --D-y
>> That's a pretty old post. Someone would have to be really stupid to
>> still be hot waxing.
>
> If you have to cast twice, you are trolling too hard.
Sorry, it wasn't intended as a troll. When so many well-respected shop
owners and employees explain about the major issues with hot waxing,
it's hard to believe that anyone is clueless enough to still be doing
it. Obviously, from the follow-ups, I was incorrect in this belief.
It is true that a hot-waxed chain is cleaner to handle than a lubricated
chain, but it's incorrect to claim that a hot-waxed chain is lubricated.
> In article <[email protected]>,
> SMS <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're wrong there. Many Believers follow that path to this
>>> day.
>>>
>>> http://www.slowtwitch.com/mainheadings/techctr/maintenance/chain.html
>>>
>>> Yep, "ferver", that's the right word all right. --D-y
>> That's a pretty old post. Someone would have to be really stupid to
>> still be hot waxing.
>
> If you have to cast twice, you are trolling too hard.
Sorry, it wasn't intended as a troll. When so many well-respected shop
owners and employees explain about the major issues with hot waxing,
it's hard to believe that anyone is clueless enough to still be doing
it. Obviously, from the follow-ups, I was incorrect in this belief.
It is true that a hot-waxed chain is cleaner to handle than a lubricated
chain, but it's incorrect to claim that a hot-waxed chain is lubricated.