If I were to promote the benefits of biking, I'd put a lady

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> It is funny that Zaumen starting foaming at the mouth over a video he
> did not even watch.

Liar - I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth about
a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> > Ranting about typos? How lame.
> >
> As lame as ranting about a video you did not even watch?

Liar - I didn't "rant" about the video - you did.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[[email protected]]

Jeez guys, I'm kinda regretting posting a URL to that local bike shop
TV ad.

Oh well--at least this conversation kept the spam for fake Rolexes or
whatever from being at the top of my news reader interface.

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> > You obviously don't understand colloquial English. The facts are
> > that you misrepresented what I had said.
> >
> Zaumen confuses opinion with fact.

Liar.

<most rest of this moron's post snipped>

> Moronic behavior is flaming someone over commenting on a video that
> the flamer has not watched. One wonders why Zaumen wanted to pick this
> fight?

Another lie - I *asked* if you imagined the video or were just ranting
about it because your anti-helmet post was in fact just a mindless
rant, with the alleged video being merely what triggered it. Given
your track record and tendency to act like the proverbial bull with
a red cape in front of it when helmets are mentioned, the idea that
you could be ranting is the most likely explanation by far.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Tom Sherman]

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>>> You obviously don't understand colloquial English. The facts are
>>> that you misrepresented what I had said.
>>>
>> Zaumen confuses opinion with fact.
>
> Liar.
>
Quoting Mike Vandeman?

> <most rest of this moron's post snipped>
>
>> Moronic behavior is flaming someone over commenting on a video that
>> the flamer has not watched. One wonders why Zaumen wanted to pick this
>> fight?
>
> Another lie - I *asked* if you imagined the video or were just ranting
> about it because your anti-helmet post was in fact just a mindless
> rant, with the alleged video being merely what triggered it. Given
> your track record and tendency to act like the proverbial bull with
> a red cape in front of it when helmets are mentioned, the idea that
> you could be ranting is the most likely explanation by far.
>
WTF would anyone think that I would post about an imaginary, since
anyone (but Zaumem) could check the link and see what was there. Duh.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Tom Sherman]

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>>> Ranting about typos? How lame.
>>>
>> As lame as ranting about a video you did not even watch?
>
> Liar - I didn't "rant" about the video - you did.
>
No, I posted a comment about the video. Zaumen went off on a rant
without even watching the video.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Tom Sherman]

[email protected] aka Victor Kan wrote:
> Jeez guys, I'm kinda regretting posting a URL to that local bike shop
> TV ad.
>
Well, Zaumen was obviously looking to pick a fight with me, so he would
have likely found something else.

> Oh well--at least this conversation kept the spam for fake Rolexes or
> whatever from being at the top of my news reader interface.
>
COOL!

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Tom Sherman]

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> It is funny that Zaumen starting foaming at the mouth over a video he
>> did not even watch.
>
> Liar - I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth about
> a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.
>
How can an opinion be a lie? Zaumen appears to be logically challenged.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> >>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >>> You obviously don't understand colloquial English. The facts are
> >>> that you misrepresented what I had said.
> >>>
> >> Zaumen confuses opinion with fact.
> > Liar.
> >
> Quoting Mike Vandeman?

No, telling you off for lying.

> WTF would anyone think that I would post about an imaginary, since
> anyone (but Zaumem) could check the link and see what was there. Duh.

Because even an incidental mention of helmets causes you to react like
the bull with the proverbial red cape in front of it.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> >>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >>> Ranting about typos? How lame.
> >>>
> >> As lame as ranting about a video you did not even watch?
> > Liar - I didn't "rant" about the video - you did.
> >
> No, I posted a comment about the video. Zaumen went off on a rant
> without even watching the video.

No, your "comment" was a rant.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> [email protected] aka Victor Kan wrote:
> > Jeez guys, I'm kinda regretting posting a URL to that local bike shop
> > TV ad.
> >
> Well, Zaumen was obviously looking to pick a fight with me, so he
> would have likely found something else.

Paranoia on Sherman's part.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> It is funny that Zaumen starting foaming at the mouth over a video he
> >> did not even watch.
> > Liar - I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth about
> > a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.
> >
> How can an opinion be a lie? Zaumen appears to be logically challenged.

Liar - as I said, I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth
about a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Tom Sherman]

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>> You obviously don't understand colloquial English. The facts are
>>>>> that you misrepresented what I had said.
>>>>>
>>>> Zaumen confuses opinion with fact.
>>> Liar.
>>>
>> Quoting Mike Vandeman?
>
> No, telling you off for lying.
>
Zaumen appears not to understand what a lie is.

>> WTF would anyone think that I would post about an imaginary, since
>> anyone (but Zaumem) could check the link and see what was there. Duh.
>
> Because even an incidental mention of helmets causes you to react like
> the bull with the proverbial red cape in front of it.
>
No Zaumen, you are the one who went off like a bull in this thread.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Tom Sherman]

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>> Ranting about typos? How lame.
>>>>>
>>>> As lame as ranting about a video you did not even watch?
>>> Liar - I didn't "rant" about the video - you did.
>>>
>> No, I posted a comment about the video. Zaumen went off on a rant
>> without even watching the video.
>
> No, your "comment" was a rant.
>
Zaumen appears to be easily offended when he does not get absolute
conformance to his opinions.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Tom Sherman]

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> [email protected] aka Victor Kan wrote:
>>> Jeez guys, I'm kinda regretting posting a URL to that local bike shop
>>> TV ad.
>>>
>> Well, Zaumen was obviously looking to pick a fight with me, so he
>> would have likely found something else.
>
> Paranoia on Sherman's part.
>
Zaumen demonstrates he does not understand what paranoia is.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Tom Sherman]

Bill Zaumen wrote:
> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
>>>
>>>> It is funny that Zaumen starting foaming at the mouth over a video he
>>>> did not even watch.
>>> Liar - I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth about
>>> a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.
>>>
>> How can an opinion be a lie? Zaumen appears to be logically challenged.
>
> Liar - as I said, I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth
> about a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.
>
More Mikey V. like behavior - Zaumen's only argument is to cast false
accusations of lying.

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> >>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> >>>>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >>>>> You obviously don't understand colloquial English. The facts are
> >>>>> that you misrepresented what I had said.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Zaumen confuses opinion with fact.
> >>> Liar.
> >>>
> >> Quoting Mike Vandeman?
> > No, telling you off for lying.
> >
> Zaumen appears not to understand what a lie is.

Projection.

> >
> No Zaumen, you are the one who went off like a bull in this thread.

Liar. You did.


--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> > No, your "comment" was a rant.
> >
> Zaumen appears to be easily offended when he does not get absolute
> conformance to his opinions.

Liar.



--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> [email protected] aka Victor Kan wrote:
> >>> Jeez guys, I'm kinda regretting posting a URL to that local bike shop
> >>> TV ad.
> >>>
> >> Well, Zaumen was obviously looking to pick a fight with me, so he
> >> would have likely found something else.
> > Paranoia on Sherman's part.
> >
> Zaumen demonstrates he does not understand what paranoia is.

Liar.



--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB

 

[Bill Z.]

Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:

> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> > Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Bill Zaumen wrote:
> >>> Tom Sherman <[email protected]> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> It is funny that Zaumen starting foaming at the mouth over a video he
> >>>> did not even watch.
> >>> Liar - I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth about
> >>> a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.
> >>>
> >> How can an opinion be a lie? Zaumen appears to be logically challenged.
> > Liar - as I said, I pointed out that *you* were foaming at the mouth
> > about a video my browser/PDF viewer would not display.
> >
> More Mikey V. like behavior - Zaumen's only argument is to cast false
> accusations of lying.

Liar - and I'm not posting anything else about it right now because
you are repeating the same old garbage.

--
My real name backwards: nemuaZ lliB