in message <
[email protected]>, Paul
('
[email protected]') wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:52:53 +0000, Simon Brooke <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>in message <[email protected]>, Paul
>>('[email protected]') wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know if there is a supplier of a reasonably priced cycly
>>> mounted inclinometer in the UK?
>>
>>D'oh!
>>
>>An inclinometer is definitely, 100%, guaranteed not going to work on a
>>bicycle, for a reason so obvious you will see it immediately if you
>>think. A gyroscopically driven artificial horizon might work.
>
> An inclinometer will work perfectly well on a bike.
>
> It might not work very well on a _moving_ bike (although if you are
> coasting downhill, or it is sufficiently damped, I can't see why it
> wouldn't give you a reasonable reading).
>
> However, I was actually intending to stop to take the reading. It just
> saves all
> the get off bike, prop up bike, get out home made inclinometer, get
> down on hands and knees ... you get the picture.
What's the point then? When you're stopped, you can lay the bike down on
its side or even turn it umop ap!sdn. Either way, you're none the wiser.
While you're on the bike, and moving, the direction of 'down' as
measured by the clinometer is a product of your speed and the radius of
the turn you are negotiating, and is in any case exactly the same as the
amount of lean required to negotiate that turn... So not only won't
work, but redundant anyway.
> I only want to check out my wimpishness and see just how steep the
> hills I feel I can barely handle are.
Ah! Pitch, not roll. OK, as you were. The answer is about 1 in 4, for an
upright. Steeper than that and you can't keep the front wheel down.
--
[email protected] (Simon Brooke)
http://www.jasmine.org.uk/~simon/
[ This mind intentionally left blank ]