Integrated headsets

Discussion in 'Cycling Equipment' started by Kent, Jan 31, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kent

    Kent Guest

    Just bought a frame and fork for my wife and am looking for a really good integrated headset to go
    with it. Having never ridden a bike with one of these headsets I am wandering into unfarmiliar
    territory and would like to hear from those who have...which one is the best choice. All considering
    posting the foolishness of my choice save your fingers. I am well aware that not everyone is a fan
    of them and that they could become obsolete as quick as a Shimano part group. The bike was bought
    because the dimensions fit my wife. So intregrated owners...what are some of the best headsets out
    there. The frame in an Orbea Dama and the fork is a Reynolds Ouzo Pro..both are 1 1/8"

    thanks Kent
     
    Tags:


  2. daveornee

    daveornee New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,763
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  3. daveornee

    daveornee New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2003
    Messages:
    2,763
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sorry my fingers never left my hands, but the message left before I had a chance to put any text in my reply.
    I have used Ritchey Logic Zero Integrated Headset in WCS, PRO, and Comp versions. They all seem to be a good value.
    My recent acquisition of a LiteSpeed Blue Ridge came with a Can Creek. It installed easily and looks good. I don't have any bad experiences with it. I just don't have much experience with it.
    The Ritchey ones all have close to 10,000 miles each with no problems.
     
  4. Orbea Zona

    Orbea Zona New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2004
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0

    I just bought an Orbea "Zona" frameset from my LBS. They said it came from the factory with a headset already.
     
  5. Just a follow up to what was said earlier about integrated headsets
    and possible frame damage: Chris King has an explanation on their
    webpage about why they think integrated headsets do pose such a
    risk--what I think an earlier poster was getting at when he suggested
    that the bearings could brinnell the integrated races and damage the
    frame. See:

    http://www.chrisking.com/tech/int_headsets_explained/int_hds_explain_appendix1.html

    (and preceding pages) for the CK explanation. Note that CK distinguish between "integrated" and
    "internal" or "zero stack" headsets, which apparently do not have this problem.

    About standardization: I was building a bike awhile ago (last summer) when I was in Europe, and
    ended up with--against what I would have preferred--a frame built for an integrated headset. The
    manufacturer claimed that it accepted some Cane Creek standard, but not a single bike store in
    Berlin had that size--each store had maybe 2 on hand, and no two I saw were alike. There was no
    standardization in size whatsoever--one mech actually got out calipers, measured and drew a diagram
    before going and trying to see if he could special order a headset to fit, and it took another store
    about 2 weeks of trying to special order one before they just gave up. So maybe it's different in
    the US or is getting easier, but for what it's worth, that was my experience.

    The frame I got was cheap, fits right, etc., and so I have no complaints--except for that damn
    headset. I tell myself now that if the frame *does* get trashed b/c of the headset--however likely
    or unlikely that may be--as long as I get 3-4 years of riding out of it, it will have paid for
    itself, it was so cheap. --V.
     
Loading...
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Loading...