Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Interference to Wireless Cyclometers from Digital Lighting

Started by Seattlerowe · · Last activity · 5 posts · 597 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
24 August 2005
Last activity
24 August 2005
Original author
Seattlerowe
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
597
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Has anyone figured out how to get around the interference caused to
    wireless cyclometers from digital lights (Niterider)? Excell Sports
    swore the new Mavic wireless cyclometer with cadence wouldn't be
    affected, and it is (operating only intermittently for both mph and
    cadence when the light is running). I like the cyclometer but hate to
    loose my mileage all winter when I commute in the dark.

  2. On 23 Aug 2005 17:25:21 -0700, "Seattlerowe" <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    Has anyone figured out how to get around the interference caused to
    wireless cyclometers from digital lights (Niterider)? Excell Sports
    swore the new Mavic wireless cyclometer with cadence wouldn't be
    affected, and it is (operating only intermittently for both mph and
    cadence when the light is running). I like the cyclometer but hate to
    loose my mileage all winter when I commute in the dark.

    See, this sort of thing is why my rule of thumb is "if it can be done with
    a wire, USE A FREAKING WIRE". Wireless when it's needed or useful (say,
    chest HRM sensors, mobile phones, etc.) is awesome, but -- particularly
    cheap and cheerful wireless like bike computers and other such low budget
    items -- is only a major hassle without offsetting benefits. Not even
    mentioning the multiple-battery thing.

    Jasper

  3. On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:58:25 GMT, Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    See, this sort of thing is why my rule of thumb is "if it can be done with
    a wire, USE A FREAKING WIRE".

    I realised that when the wireless bike computer I had used to own
    advanced by leaps and bounds (ranging from 30 metres to more than 4km)
    if it was in my pocket when I walked through supermarket anti-theft
    detectors.

  4. Not exactly the kind of help I was looking for.

  5. Andrew Price said:

    On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:58:25 GMT, Jasper Janssen <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    See, this sort of thing is why my rule of thumb is "if it can be done with
    a wire, USE A FREAKING WIRE".

    I realised that when the wireless bike computer I had used to own
    advanced by leaps and bounds (ranging from 30 metres to more than 4km)
    if it was in my pocket when I walked through supermarket anti-theft
    detectors.

    Mine (A Mity 3) did that if it was in my pocket with my keys, since each
    time two bits of my keyring contacted the two contacts on the back was
    counted as one revolution of the wheel (Max speeds of nearly 200 kph were
    observed).

    But at least that was predictable and could be avoided simply.

    Jasper

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.