CyclingForums
A community for cyclists, gear, training and racing.
General fitness, health and nutrition · Public discussion
Thread details
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
I think everyone should aspire to have a theory named after
them, so here's my attempt: Tanner's Law -- There's really
not that much difference between running 6 miles and 15
miles. It's difficult to build your longest run up to 6
miles, but after that there's not much of a jump in
difficulty until you reach 15 miles.
Lots of my running friends have agreed with this
observation, and I myself just confirmed it again today with
my first 15+ run since Boston...
Comments?
For me it was 5 miles and 20 :-)
--
Colm
"GTanner" <[email hidden]> wrote in
message "]news:[email hidden]...
: I think everyone should aspire to have a theory named
: after them, so here's my attempt: Tanner's Law -- There's
: really not that much difference between running 6 miles
: and 15 miles. It's difficult to build your longest run up
: to 6 miles, but after that there's not much of a jump in
: difficulty until you reach 15 miles.
Have you considered calling it the 'Crock of [censored] Law'
I did, but it's not my law. Try asking the scientist who
posted it.
--
Colm
"Bethowmuch" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:20040531084110.15979.00000222@mb-
m16.aol.com...
: Have you considered calling it the 'Crock of [censored] Law'
Active in the last 60 minutes
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.