Not economic value, per se, but intangible value, in the sense that a "vintage" bike is part of the historic record of the technology and the sport. Not that I'm truly clear on what exactly counts as "vintage" - but I would say anything at least 20 years old.
The reason I ask, I picked up a circa 1983 Huffy Windsprint at a thrift shop last fall, with the intent of using it as a tear-down/rebuild bike with as much new equipment on it as possible, solely for the purpose of teaching myself something about bicycle mechanics.
So, I'm actually close to finding the time to work on this project, and ... maybe it's "wrong" to essentially throw away virtually everything except the frame and possibly the handlebars. Maybe I should just replace the truly disposable parts, brake pads, tires, pedals, and keep the rest. It's actually in very good shape, looks to me like a bike someone bought, rode a few times, and then abandoned in the garage for 30 years before deciding to get rid of it.
But, OTOH, it is mechanically in good shape, but the technology on it is decidedly low-end. An upgrade would make it a much better bike.
So, keep as is, or retrofit with new technology to make it more "rider-friendly"??? I know there isn't a "right or wrong" answer, just seeking opinions.
The reason I ask, I picked up a circa 1983 Huffy Windsprint at a thrift shop last fall, with the intent of using it as a tear-down/rebuild bike with as much new equipment on it as possible, solely for the purpose of teaching myself something about bicycle mechanics.
So, I'm actually close to finding the time to work on this project, and ... maybe it's "wrong" to essentially throw away virtually everything except the frame and possibly the handlebars. Maybe I should just replace the truly disposable parts, brake pads, tires, pedals, and keep the rest. It's actually in very good shape, looks to me like a bike someone bought, rode a few times, and then abandoned in the garage for 30 years before deciding to get rid of it.
But, OTOH, it is mechanically in good shape, but the technology on it is decidedly low-end. An upgrade would make it a much better bike.
So, keep as is, or retrofit with new technology to make it more "rider-friendly"??? I know there isn't a "right or wrong" answer, just seeking opinions.