Islam and Bicycling in NYC



Pete wrote:

> We broke it. Should we help fix it, or should we just say "Ok, bye now. Hope
> you're successful in fixing it."


EVEN IF WE "BROKE IT" ON PURPOSE?
The purpose of course, is to fix it....and make scads of CASH.

--

http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html
"Bubba got a BJ, BU$H screwed us all!" - Slim
http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/weapons.html#wms
George "The AWOL President" Bush: http://www.awolbush.com/
WHY IRAQ?: http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html
http://www.toostupidtobepresident.com/shockwave/chickenhawks.htm


VOTE HIM OUT! November 2, 2004
 
Pete wrote:

> We broke it. Should we help fix it, or should we just say "Ok, bye now. Hope
> you're successful in fixing it."


EVEN IF WE "BROKE IT" ON PURPOSE?
The purpose of course, is to fix it....and make scads of CASH.

--

http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html
"Bubba got a BJ, BU$H screwed us all!" - Slim
http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/weapons.html#wms
George "The AWOL President" Bush: http://www.awolbush.com/
WHY IRAQ?: http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html
http://www.toostupidtobepresident.com/shockwave/chickenhawks.htm


VOTE HIM OUT! November 2, 2004
 
Pete wrote:

> If all we wanted was the oil, it would have been *far* cheaper to push for
> ending the sanctions and just buying it.


Why buy when you can steal?
--

http://www.bushflash.com/thanks.html
"Bubba got a BJ, BU$H screwed us all!" - Slim
http://www.worldmessenger.20m.com/weapons.html#wms
George "The AWOL President" Bush: http://www.awolbush.com/
WHY IRAQ?: http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html
http://www.toostupidtobepresident.com/shockwave/chickenhawks.htm


VOTE HIM OUT! November 2, 2004
 
"slim" <pickin'[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Pete wrote:
>
> > If all we wanted was the oil, it would have been *far* cheaper to push
for
> > ending the sanctions and just buying it.
>
>
> Why buy when you can steal?

In this case, "stealing" is more expensive than buying.

Pete
 
Pete wrote:

>"slim" <pickin'[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>
>
>>Pete wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>If all we wanted was the oil, it would have been *far* cheaper to push
>>>
>>>
>for
>
>
>>>ending the sanctions and just buying it.
>>>
>>>
>>Why buy when you can steal?
>>
>>
>
>In this case, "stealing" is more expensive than buying.
>
>Pete
>
>
>

Do you really think the costs to Halliburton are so high? Looks like a
sweet deal to me.

You and I are paying for it, and we don't count.

Jack Dingler
 
"Jack Dingler" <[email protected]> wrote

>
> Do you really think the costs to Halliburton are so high? Looks like a
> sweet deal to me.
>
> You and I are paying for it, and we don't count.

Halliburton isn't the only entity over there. There a few troops here and
there which factor into the cost, and not just monetarily.

And you and I pay for it either way.

Pete
 
Pete wrote:

>"Jack Dingler" <[email protected]> wrote
>
>
>
>>Do you really think the costs to Halliburton are so high? Looks like a
>>sweet deal to me.
>>
>>You and I are paying for it, and we don't count.
>>
>>
>
>Halliburton isn't the only entity over there. There a few troops here and
>there which factor into the cost, and not just monetarily.
>
>And you and I pay for it either way.
>
>Pete
>
>
>

How much is Halliburton paying for the troops?

It doesn't matter what something costs, but whom it costs. Since the
taxpayers are covering the costs while industry gets a free ride,
there's not downside for politicians. They get their golden parachutes
even if they lose, and are replaced by other industry shills.

Jack Dingler
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom Back