isnt it funny...

isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

 

On Fri, 23 May 2003 11:04:56 +0200, Michael Pitt wrote:
>isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.

 

In article <[email protected]>, Ewoud Dronkert
<[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 23 May 2003 11:04:56 +0200, Michael Pitt wrote:
> >isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....
>
> Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.

Goes to show the doping Simoni did was meaningless for his performance and Garzelli's was from
tainted chicken of a drug that really is meaningless.

-WG

 

I think it is fricken hilarious.......

"Ewoud Dronkert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Fri, 23 May 2003 11:04:56 +0200, Michael Pitt wrote:
> >isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....
>
> Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.

 

warren <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<230520030714409547%[email protected]>...
> In article <[email protected]>, Ewoud Dronkert
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 May 2003 11:04:56 +0200, Michael Pitt wrote:
> > >isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....
> >
> > Goes to show that doping has very little net result on races.
>
> Goes to show the doping Simoni did was meaningless for his performance and Garzelli's was from
> tainted chicken of a drug that really is meaningless.
>
> -WG

Actually, it doesn't 'go to show' anything. You don't know if they were doping then. You don't know
if they are doping now. Nor do you know the doping habits of their competition.

Why does everyone in cycling think they can ferret out who is doping, when they are doping, and
whether it works or not, when nobody knows what anyone is actually doing?

-RJ

 

"Michael Pitt" <[email protected]> wrote:

>isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

In fact Simoni was never punished. His team convinced him to withdraw. Later, he was acquitted from
any doping charge.

 

"Davide Tosi" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> "Michael Pitt" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....
>
> In fact Simoni was never punished. His team convinced him to withdraw. Later, he was acquitted
> from any doping charge.

I think that you may be correct, he actually overdosed on Padan food!

Hawke

 

> isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....

Even better: look at the top10: Simoni, Garzelli, Rumsas, Casagrande, Pantani (i'm not sure about
totschnig)

 

"Kenny" <[email protected]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:[email protected]...
> > isn´t it funny that both leaders in giro were punished for doping are leading again....
>
> Even better: look at the top10: Simoni, Garzelli, Rumsas, Casagrande, Pantani (i'm not sure about
> totschnig)

you´re so right.... i´m afraid trouble started really when Indurain retired...

 

"Ronaldo Jeremiah" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> Actually, it doesn't 'go to show' anything. You don't know if they were doping then. You don't
> know if they are doping now. Nor do you know the doping habits of their competition.

Renaldo Jeremiah is correct.