JS - I guess you have to do what you have to do, but I cant even see how anyone could actually physically sit on that
Been plodding away doing loads of 1-2hr SST and tempo rides getting the miles in and making the most of the mild weather, as well as a few club runs. Was still in shorts and short sleeves until 2 days ago when autumn suddenly arrived with 20mph winds and cold temps. I've been riding my singlespeed a lot and have made up a freehub for the PT wheel so that I can run the PT on the singlespeed and get some numbers! Its actually surprising how many TSS I was racking up on these rides. Its also providing a great range of cadence work with high rpm spinning on the flats with tailwinds through to lower rpm hills and headwinds. No idea if this really has any training impact over time or not though, other than a feeling of greater flexibility in the legs to cope with different cadences?
One thing I have seen a lot written about this autumn is the 'low/high' training approach - where the majority of miles are done at L2 with just a few quality sessions at L4/5. They espouse almost the opposite of the SST threshold approach and claim L3/SST work racks up too much fatigue to allow high quality sessions to be completed as well as they should be. In some ways this seems to have been true with me this year as I racked up loads of tempo and SST riding and certainly improved my depth of fitness, but I recognise I didnt do enough quality L4 work and I'm sure this contributed to my stagnation of FTP. There is no doubt I benefited from all the work as my ability to produce good power over long periods has improved, and many of my clubmates will testify after dragging them all along for extended periods on recent club rides, but I'm not sure my 30-60 min power improved as much as it could have?
There are lots of testimonies about this 'high/low' approach in relation to elite athletes in cycling, rowing, skiing etc but that also makes me wonder how applicable it is to those of us who cant train 15-20 hours a week? If you are only doing those L2 rides for 100-120 mins at a time then do you actually do enough work to stimulate any aerobic development at all? It seems at this time of year the suggestion would be an 80/20 approach so perhaps 3-4 sessions of L2 per week and 1 L4/5 session, and then as you move into next year the balance starts to tilt the other way with less volume and more intensity - starting with the gradual introduction of tempo riding and moving into larger amounts of L4/5 work as race season approaches.
I'm interested to hear thoughts and experiences with this approach?
Been plodding away doing loads of 1-2hr SST and tempo rides getting the miles in and making the most of the mild weather, as well as a few club runs. Was still in shorts and short sleeves until 2 days ago when autumn suddenly arrived with 20mph winds and cold temps. I've been riding my singlespeed a lot and have made up a freehub for the PT wheel so that I can run the PT on the singlespeed and get some numbers! Its actually surprising how many TSS I was racking up on these rides. Its also providing a great range of cadence work with high rpm spinning on the flats with tailwinds through to lower rpm hills and headwinds. No idea if this really has any training impact over time or not though, other than a feeling of greater flexibility in the legs to cope with different cadences?
One thing I have seen a lot written about this autumn is the 'low/high' training approach - where the majority of miles are done at L2 with just a few quality sessions at L4/5. They espouse almost the opposite of the SST threshold approach and claim L3/SST work racks up too much fatigue to allow high quality sessions to be completed as well as they should be. In some ways this seems to have been true with me this year as I racked up loads of tempo and SST riding and certainly improved my depth of fitness, but I recognise I didnt do enough quality L4 work and I'm sure this contributed to my stagnation of FTP. There is no doubt I benefited from all the work as my ability to produce good power over long periods has improved, and many of my clubmates will testify after dragging them all along for extended periods on recent club rides, but I'm not sure my 30-60 min power improved as much as it could have?
There are lots of testimonies about this 'high/low' approach in relation to elite athletes in cycling, rowing, skiing etc but that also makes me wonder how applicable it is to those of us who cant train 15-20 hours a week? If you are only doing those L2 rides for 100-120 mins at a time then do you actually do enough work to stimulate any aerobic development at all? It seems at this time of year the suggestion would be an 80/20 approach so perhaps 3-4 sessions of L2 per week and 1 L4/5 session, and then as you move into next year the balance starts to tilt the other way with less volume and more intensity - starting with the gradual introduction of tempo riding and moving into larger amounts of L4/5 work as race season approaches.
I'm interested to hear thoughts and experiences with this approach?