(Mark) said:WB <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:...knows no bounds.
The relentless self-aggrandizement of Drewster only serves to discredit her positions and
sources.
jD is the source of *most* of the wagons of manure that is MHA.
Comments ?
WB
Actually, I don't think I've ever seen her actually contribute much to the discussion aside
from screeching "Liar!!" and waving her arms about -- when she gets them loose of her
straightjacket, that is.
Oh come on Mark. Let's not sell Jan Drew short. She also has screeched stalker, drug pusher, accused
people of being members of EEEEEEEVIL organized medicine, accused me of leading nudie hikes, etc.
Jan has quite a repertoire when it comes to disparaging others with her false accusations (bearing
false witness).
Quoted message said:
Mostly, she serves as a beautiful (I've seen her picture, therefore I use the term figuratively
But have you seen her toothless smile??
Quoted message said:Entertainment value, I'll grant. Information source? Naaah...
I completely disagree. I think Jan is a great source of information. She serves as a illuminating
cautionary tale. After all how often do you get such a complete history of someone who obviously is
somatically hypervigilant, highly suggestible, and has powerful placebo responses that are only
transient.
I think readers can learn much from Jan Drew. They can also learn much about themselves. Jan Drew is
very good at triggering hot spots in people. One can use the angry reaction toward her to learn a
great deal about yourself.
The trick is to realize that Jan Drew is a very sick (in all senses of the word) woman who will
attack you personally if you disagree with her POV. The other trick is to realize that it is a
complete exercise in futility trying to engage in a meaningful discussion with her. You either agree
with her POV and get on her good side or you disagree with her and become Satanically possessed (in
her mind).
Aloha,
Rich
Quoted message said:
Mark, MD
------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------
The best defense to logic is ignorance.
