This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for
children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing
schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers can
make helmet wearing compusory for children walking to
school. I looked for some indication this was a spoof site
but couldn't see any. Behits next campaign? Makes as much
sense as criminalising the parents of toddlers on trikes I
suppose. Iain
UK and Europe · Public discussion
Japanese CYcle Helmets
Thread details
What we know about this thread
- Original section
- UK and Europe
- Published
- 1 July 2004
- Last activity
- 2 July 2004
- Original author
- Iarocu
- Posts
- 4
- Discussion status
- Public discussion
- Total views
- 1,825
- Views / 30 days
- 0
The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.
-
-
On 1/7/04 10:42 pm, in article
[email hidden], "iarocu"Quoted message said:
This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for
children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing
schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers
can make helmet wearing compusory for children walking
to school.Quoted message said:
I looked for some indication this was a spoof site but
couldn't see any.Quoted message said:
Behits next campaign? Makes as much sense as criminalising
the parents of toddlers on trikes I suppose.It's not a spoof. However the only conclusion is that the
numbers are too small to say anything meaningful...d
-
in message <[email hidden]>, iarocu
(') said:
This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for
children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing
schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers can
make helmet wearing compusory for children walking to
school. I looked for some indication this was a spoof site
but couldn't see any. Behits next campaign? Makes as much
sense as criminalising the parents of toddlers on trikes I
suppose. Iain"CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between
children wearing helmets and those not wearing helmets in
the incidence of all injuries and head injuries by Xy test.
The odds ratio for the no helmet system was 1.26 ( 0.92 to
1.71 for 95 % confidence) for all injuries and 1.46 ( 0.45
to 4.12 for 95 % confidence) for head injuries."What a surprise.
--
[email hidden] (Simon Brooke)
jasmine.org.uk~simonOpen ↗'You cannot put "The Internet" into the
Recycle Bin.' -
Simon Brooke <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...
Quoted message said:
in message
<[email hidden]>, iarocu(') said:
This link refers to a study comparing injury rates for
children attending helmet wearing and non helmet wearing
schools in Japan. In the city concerned head teachers
can make helmet wearing compusory for children walking
to school. I looked for some indication this was a spoof
site but couldn't see any. Behits next campaign? Makes
as much sense as criminalising the parents of toddlers
on trikes I suppose. Iain"CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between
children wearing helmets and those not wearing helmets in
the incidence of all injuries and head injuries by Xy
test. The odds ratio for the no helmet system was 1.26 (
0.92 to 1.71 for 95 % confidence) for all injuries and
1.46 ( 0.45 to 4.12 for 95 % confidence) for head
injuries."What a surprise.
So of course the schools that currently require walking
helmets will immediately make them optional.Or more likely there will be a campaign to introduce them
here following their proven success in Japan.--
Dave...I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want
to achieve it through not dying. — Woody Allen
Active in the last 60 minutes
Active in this thread
0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total
No signed-in users are active right now.
No known search crawlers active right now.