C
Crank Yanker
Guest
> Just exactly what dope would she be on that has such a marked effect, yet doesn't result in a
> positive test?
The drug would be called EPO. The fact that she's only being tested for EPO because her hematocrit
is above the limit suggests that it is pretty rare for women's events to test for EPO (and the test
is only a couple of years old). I imagine because it cost alot.
> If anything, all this means is Jeanson's people should have sought a waiver for a high hematocrit
> like Vaughters did. Outside of that, it means nothing else.
Dumbass, Vaughter's gets a waiver because he's demonstrated that it is normal for his hematocrit to
be above 50%. Has Jeanson done the same?
Between this and your statistics posts, I think you might be retarded.
P.S. Wasn't there a story a few months back about a Montreal MD that was being investigated for
doping female cyclists? Anybody heard more about this?
> positive test?
The drug would be called EPO. The fact that she's only being tested for EPO because her hematocrit
is above the limit suggests that it is pretty rare for women's events to test for EPO (and the test
is only a couple of years old). I imagine because it cost alot.
> If anything, all this means is Jeanson's people should have sought a waiver for a high hematocrit
> like Vaughters did. Outside of that, it means nothing else.
Dumbass, Vaughter's gets a waiver because he's demonstrated that it is normal for his hematocrit to
be above 50%. Has Jeanson done the same?
Between this and your statistics posts, I think you might be retarded.
P.S. Wasn't there a story a few months back about a Montreal MD that was being investigated for
doping female cyclists? Anybody heard more about this?