trg wrote:
> "Raptor" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
>
>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>
>
> No, pre-war he came out against the invasion. Maybe it was just a ploy to
> get into Sheryl pants?
>
>
And that is a stronger, more sensible basis for maintaining a political
stance than most Americans have.
trg wrote:
> "Raptor" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
>
>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>
>
> No, pre-war he came out against the invasion. Maybe it was just a ploy to
> get into Sheryl pants?
>
>
And that is a stronger, more sensible basis for maintaining a political
stance than most Americans have.
trg wrote:
> "Raptor" <[email protected]> a écrit dans le message de news:
> [email protected]...
>
>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>
>
> No, pre-war he came out against the invasion. Maybe it was just a ploy to
> get into Sheryl pants?
>
>
And that is a stronger, more sensible basis for maintaining a political
stance than most Americans have.
Raptor wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>
>
> Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
> Something else, I mean.
>
>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>> to further his own political objectives,
>
>
> Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
> agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>
> that Bush got us involved in a
>
>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>
>
> Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
> lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
> non-committal.
>
> and that the Republican Party
>
>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>> their pursuit of power.
>
>
> Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>
> I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
> Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
> exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
Nice to know. We were on vacation just a couple of weeks ago in the
national parks in UT/AZ--magnificent.
We were traveling with my brother-in-law and his family. His wife had
the temerity to ask a family in Zion not to feed the ravens--that in
fact it was subject to a fine. His answer was--"I bet you belong to
that See-ayra club. Wait--where are you from? My family is taking bets
on where you come from?" They were trying to sneak peeks at the license
plates on our rental car, (which had NV plates).
I certainly wasn't inclined to let my lefty views show after that.
Steve
>
> stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
> ill- or mis-informed,
> a religious activist.
>
> Add in the facts that Lance is at least fairly intelligent and clearly
> agnostic, and I put the odds on him being at least a bit more of a Kerry
> fan than Shrub. Sheryl Crow will push him further to the light side of
> political ideology.
>
Raptor wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>
>
> Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
> Something else, I mean.
>
>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>> to further his own political objectives,
>
>
> Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
> agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>
> that Bush got us involved in a
>
>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>
>
> Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
> lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
> non-committal.
>
> and that the Republican Party
>
>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>> their pursuit of power.
>
>
> Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>
> I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
> Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
> exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
Nice to know. We were on vacation just a couple of weeks ago in the
national parks in UT/AZ--magnificent.
We were traveling with my brother-in-law and his family. His wife had
the temerity to ask a family in Zion not to feed the ravens--that in
fact it was subject to a fine. His answer was--"I bet you belong to
that See-ayra club. Wait--where are you from? My family is taking bets
on where you come from?" They were trying to sneak peeks at the license
plates on our rental car, (which had NV plates).
I certainly wasn't inclined to let my lefty views show after that.
Steve
>
> stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
> ill- or mis-informed,
> a religious activist.
>
> Add in the facts that Lance is at least fairly intelligent and clearly
> agnostic, and I put the odds on him being at least a bit more of a Kerry
> fan than Shrub. Sheryl Crow will push him further to the light side of
> political ideology.
>
Raptor wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>
>
> Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
> Something else, I mean.
>
>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>> to further his own political objectives,
>
>
> Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
> agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>
> that Bush got us involved in a
>
>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>
>
> Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
> lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
> non-committal.
>
> and that the Republican Party
>
>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>> their pursuit of power.
>
>
> Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>
> I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
> Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
> exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
Nice to know. We were on vacation just a couple of weeks ago in the
national parks in UT/AZ--magnificent.
We were traveling with my brother-in-law and his family. His wife had
the temerity to ask a family in Zion not to feed the ravens--that in
fact it was subject to a fine. His answer was--"I bet you belong to
that See-ayra club. Wait--where are you from? My family is taking bets
on where you come from?" They were trying to sneak peeks at the license
plates on our rental car, (which had NV plates).
I certainly wasn't inclined to let my lefty views show after that.
Steve
>
> stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
> ill- or mis-informed,
> a religious activist.
>
> Add in the facts that Lance is at least fairly intelligent and clearly
> agnostic, and I put the odds on him being at least a bit more of a Kerry
> fan than Shrub. Sheryl Crow will push him further to the light side of
> political ideology.
>
Raptor wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>
>
> Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
> Something else, I mean.
>
>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>> to further his own political objectives,
>
>
> Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
> agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>
> that Bush got us involved in a
>
>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>
>
> Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
> lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
> non-committal.
>
> and that the Republican Party
>
>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>> their pursuit of power.
>
>
> Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>
> I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
> Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
> exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
Nice to know. We were on vacation just a couple of weeks ago in the
national parks in UT/AZ--magnificent.
We were traveling with my brother-in-law and his family. His wife had
the temerity to ask a family in Zion not to feed the ravens--that in
fact it was subject to a fine. His answer was--"I bet you belong to
that See-ayra club. Wait--where are you from? My family is taking bets
on where you come from?" They were trying to sneak peeks at the license
plates on our rental car, (which had NV plates).
I certainly wasn't inclined to let my lefty views show after that.
Steve
>
> stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
> ill- or mis-informed,
> a religious activist.
>
> Add in the facts that Lance is at least fairly intelligent and clearly
> agnostic, and I put the odds on him being at least a bit more of a Kerry
> fan than Shrub. Sheryl Crow will push him further to the light side of
> political ideology.
>
Raptor wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>
>
> Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
> Something else, I mean.
>
>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>> to further his own political objectives,
>
>
> Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
> agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>
> that Bush got us involved in a
>
>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>
>
> Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
> lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
> non-committal.
>
> and that the Republican Party
>
>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>> their pursuit of power.
>
>
> Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>
> I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
> Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
> exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
Nice to know. We were on vacation just a couple of weeks ago in the
national parks in UT/AZ--magnificent.
We were traveling with my brother-in-law and his family. His wife had
the temerity to ask a family in Zion not to feed the ravens--that in
fact it was subject to a fine. His answer was--"I bet you belong to
that See-ayra club. Wait--where are you from? My family is taking bets
on where you come from?" They were trying to sneak peeks at the license
plates on our rental car, (which had NV plates).
I certainly wasn't inclined to let my lefty views show after that.
Steve
>
> stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
> ill- or mis-informed,
> a religious activist.
>
> Add in the facts that Lance is at least fairly intelligent and clearly
> agnostic, and I put the odds on him being at least a bit more of a Kerry
> fan than Shrub. Sheryl Crow will push him further to the light side of
> political ideology.
>
Raptor wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>
>
> Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
> Something else, I mean.
>
>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>> to further his own political objectives,
>
>
> Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
> agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>
> that Bush got us involved in a
>
>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>
>
> Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
> lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
> non-committal.
>
> and that the Republican Party
>
>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>> their pursuit of power.
>
>
> Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>
> I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
> Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
> exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
Nice to know. We were on vacation just a couple of weeks ago in the
national parks in UT/AZ--magnificent.
We were traveling with my brother-in-law and his family. His wife had
the temerity to ask a family in Zion not to feed the ravens--that in
fact it was subject to a fine. His answer was--"I bet you belong to
that See-ayra club. Wait--where are you from? My family is taking bets
on where you come from?" They were trying to sneak peeks at the license
plates on our rental car, (which had NV plates).
I certainly wasn't inclined to let my lefty views show after that.
Steve
>
> stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
> ill- or mis-informed,
> a religious activist.
>
> Add in the facts that Lance is at least fairly intelligent and clearly
> agnostic, and I put the odds on him being at least a bit more of a Kerry
> fan than Shrub. Sheryl Crow will push him further to the light side of
> political ideology.
>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:36:53 -0700, Tim Lines <[email protected]> wrote:
>Carl Sundquist wrote:
>>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>>Is there someone who really loves "crass commercialism"?
>>
>>
>> Mrs. Kerry?
>>
>
>My guess would be that she could do without the crass part.
Crass is the one thing Theresa Kerry is ALL about.
>My guess could be wrong. I've only had my cable hooked up for 2+ weeks
>now after living without for 10 years. Some of that **** qualifies as
>crass commercialism and if it's on, somebody must like it. I'd bet that
>if I figured out who likes that ****, I'd find that it's appeal crosses
>political boundaries. I'd bet more than I have on that.
Nobody ever lost money by underestimating the taste of the buying public.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:36:53 -0700, Tim Lines <[email protected]> wrote:
>Carl Sundquist wrote:
>>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>>Is there someone who really loves "crass commercialism"?
>>
>>
>> Mrs. Kerry?
>>
>
>My guess would be that she could do without the crass part.
Crass is the one thing Theresa Kerry is ALL about.
>My guess could be wrong. I've only had my cable hooked up for 2+ weeks
>now after living without for 10 years. Some of that **** qualifies as
>crass commercialism and if it's on, somebody must like it. I'd bet that
>if I figured out who likes that ****, I'd find that it's appeal crosses
>political boundaries. I'd bet more than I have on that.
Nobody ever lost money by underestimating the taste of the buying public.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:36:53 -0700, Tim Lines <[email protected]> wrote:
>Carl Sundquist wrote:
>>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>>Is there someone who really loves "crass commercialism"?
>>
>>
>> Mrs. Kerry?
>>
>
>My guess would be that she could do without the crass part.
Crass is the one thing Theresa Kerry is ALL about.
>My guess could be wrong. I've only had my cable hooked up for 2+ weeks
>now after living without for 10 years. Some of that **** qualifies as
>crass commercialism and if it's on, somebody must like it. I'd bet that
>if I figured out who likes that ****, I'd find that it's appeal crosses
>political boundaries. I'd bet more than I have on that.
Nobody ever lost money by underestimating the taste of the buying public.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:36:53 -0700, Tim Lines <[email protected]> wrote:
>Carl Sundquist wrote:
>>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>>Is there someone who really loves "crass commercialism"?
>>
>>
>> Mrs. Kerry?
>>
>
>My guess would be that she could do without the crass part.
Crass is the one thing Theresa Kerry is ALL about.
>My guess could be wrong. I've only had my cable hooked up for 2+ weeks
>now after living without for 10 years. Some of that **** qualifies as
>crass commercialism and if it's on, somebody must like it. I'd bet that
>if I figured out who likes that ****, I'd find that it's appeal crosses
>political boundaries. I'd bet more than I have on that.
Nobody ever lost money by underestimating the taste of the buying public.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:36:53 -0700, Tim Lines <[email protected]> wrote:
>Carl Sundquist wrote:
>>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>>Is there someone who really loves "crass commercialism"?
>>
>>
>> Mrs. Kerry?
>>
>
>My guess would be that she could do without the crass part.
Crass is the one thing Theresa Kerry is ALL about.
>My guess could be wrong. I've only had my cable hooked up for 2+ weeks
>now after living without for 10 years. Some of that **** qualifies as
>crass commercialism and if it's on, somebody must like it. I'd bet that
>if I figured out who likes that ****, I'd find that it's appeal crosses
>political boundaries. I'd bet more than I have on that.
Nobody ever lost money by underestimating the taste of the buying public.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:36:53 -0700, Tim Lines <[email protected]> wrote:
>Carl Sundquist wrote:
>>
>> Tim Lines wrote:
>>
>>>Is there someone who really loves "crass commercialism"?
>>
>>
>> Mrs. Kerry?
>>
>
>My guess would be that she could do without the crass part.
Crass is the one thing Theresa Kerry is ALL about.
>My guess could be wrong. I've only had my cable hooked up for 2+ weeks
>now after living without for 10 years. Some of that **** qualifies as
>crass commercialism and if it's on, somebody must like it. I'd bet that
>if I figured out who likes that ****, I'd find that it's appeal crosses
>political boundaries. I'd bet more than I have on that.
Nobody ever lost money by underestimating the taste of the buying public.
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:09:21 GMT, C.M. Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>>
>>Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
>>Something else, I mean.
>>
>>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>>> to further his own political objectives,
>>
>>Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
>>agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>>
>>that Bush got us involved in a
>>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>>
>>and that the Republican Party
>>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>>> their pursuit of power.
>>
>>Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>>
>>I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
>>Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
>>exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
>>
>>stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
>>ill- or mis-informed,
>>a religious activist.
>>
>
>It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
>success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
>Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.
>
>Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
>Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".
Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:09:21 GMT, C.M. Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>>
>>Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
>>Something else, I mean.
>>
>>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>>> to further his own political objectives,
>>
>>Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
>>agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>>
>>that Bush got us involved in a
>>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>>
>>and that the Republican Party
>>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>>> their pursuit of power.
>>
>>Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>>
>>I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
>>Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
>>exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
>>
>>stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
>>ill- or mis-informed,
>>a religious activist.
>>
>
>It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
>success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
>Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.
>
>Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
>Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".
Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:09:21 GMT, C.M. Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>>
>>Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
>>Something else, I mean.
>>
>>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>>> to further his own political objectives,
>>
>>Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
>>agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>>
>>that Bush got us involved in a
>>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>>
>>and that the Republican Party
>>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>>> their pursuit of power.
>>
>>Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>>
>>I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
>>Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
>>exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
>>
>>stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
>>ill- or mis-informed,
>>a religious activist.
>>
>
>It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
>success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
>Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.
>
>Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
>Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".
Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:09:21 GMT, C.M. Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>>
>>Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
>>Something else, I mean.
>>
>>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>>> to further his own political objectives,
>>
>>Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
>>agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>>
>>that Bush got us involved in a
>>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>>
>>and that the Republican Party
>>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>>> their pursuit of power.
>>
>>Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>>
>>I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
>>Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
>>exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
>>
>>stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
>>ill- or mis-informed,
>>a religious activist.
>>
>
>It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
>success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
>Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.
>
>Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
>Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".
Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:09:21 GMT, C.M. Burns <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:35:59 -0600, Raptor <[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>>[email protected] wrote:
>>> Apparently Kerry is there at LA's invitation. Crow worked for Kerry in
>>> 2004 and Armstrong and Crow were in Boston for the post-election party.
>>
>>Crow is a flaming libbie. I knew there was somthing I liked about her.
>>Something else, I mean.
>>
>>> Maybe Armstrong has figured out that Bush is a sociopath who uses him
>>> to further his own political objectives,
>>
>>Can't tell from Lance's comments, as far as I have seen. (Not sure I
>>agree with it either. I don't think Shrub is a sociopath.)
>>
>>that Bush got us involved in a
>>> stupid war whose cost in American lives, money and international
>>> influence is almost beyond conprehension,
>>
>>Likely (that Lance realizes this) if you do a lot of reading between the
>>lines of what he's said. His few comments about the war have been
>>non-committal.
>>
>>and that the Republican Party
>>> no longer represents individualism but instead stands for borrowing
>>> money from the Chinese to wage a wasteful war and finance taxcuts and
>>> war profiteering for Bush's cronies, for wasted US military power, for
>>> rightwing fundamentalism shoved down your throat, and for a gang of
>>> creeps that are willing to do anything, no matter how treasonous, in
>>> their pursuit of power.
>>
>>Have no clue what Lance thinks about this.
>>
>>I have yet to find an intelligent AND informed person who voted for
>>Shrub. (And I live in Utah; the odds are there for such people to
>>exist.) As near as I can tell, you voted for Shrub only if you were:
>>
>>stupid (including failure to think about your vote),
>>ill- or mis-informed,
>>a religious activist.
>>
>
>It's such well informed opinions as these that account for great
>success that the Democratic party has had in Congressional,
>Senatorial, and Presidential elections recently.
>
>Democrates need to come up with a little better slogan than "Vote for
>Us or you must be miss-informed, religious bigot, moron!".
Hey, they're doing great with that. Let 'em go ahead. <SHHhhhhhhh>
