Note: Johnny NoCom's postings effected BROLs operations and may have
damaged BROL's relationships with its advertizers. My suggestion to
Bryan was to check a post made here as to Johnny's ID, which is still
unknown. I suggested that if the post made here was accurate and BROL
had suffered damages that Bryan sue for recovery of damages. That is
hardly friivolous non factual lawsuit. However that post resulted in
JNC's posting the following:
"You have taken the registered trademark Johnny NoCom® and posted
false
misleading information on the internet regarding identity of this
registered trademark. The ill informed remarks you have made on BROL
regarding Johnny NoCom® will no longer be tolerated.
"My legal team suggests that your home, business and retirement assets
will be taken away for compensation of damages you have caused with
your
posts made on BROL. In addition to suing for registered trademark
damages Johnny NoCom® will also contact your ISP and shut it down.
"This is the best way to warn other would be Ken the Troll that posting
lies to the public about a registered trademark is a game they do not
want to play."
That is clearly threatening a "frivolous non factual lawsuit" on the
part of Johnny and not on my part. I have never engaged in any lawsuit,
although my wife is totally disabled due to exposure to Agent Orange
when she worked for the manufacturer and we surely could have engaged
in a lawsuit. I find that suing especially when there is no actually
damages is usually a waste of money and make lawyers happy not the
clients.
Oh well. It sure seems funny to get this reaction from Johnny if, as he
maintains the person identifed as actually being him is not actually
him, thus he was not actually effected by the post in question.