I understand your points, but remain unmoved by them with
consideration of the balance of health goals and eating
habits. Each of your points can be answered, but like the
practice, concern for them are very far down the list of
concerns. It smacks me too much of the fad even cult, a
thing the area of nutrition must perhaps be at the top of
the list for generating and fostering.
>Maybe. But the reality is that palatability and taste *do*
>affect people's food choices.
>
>If you can make people eat more beetroot and carrots by
>pulverising them then it may be worth doing - especially if
>the alternative is cooked and processed junk food - rather
>than the equivalent raw produce.
>
>> and the second easily solved by adding the material to
>> other cooked foods, soup for example, that would eliminat
>> any problems mentioned [...]
>
>Wheatgrass soup?!?
>
>I think this goes against the whole idea of getting access
>to the nutrients in *raw* foods.
>
>Juicing grass gives access to the nutrients *without*
>raising them to high temperatures.
>
>High temperatures are known to be powerful destructive
>forces that make all kinds of modifications to nutrients.
>
>Juicing avoids all that, and provides access to the
>nutrients *without* cooking them.
>
>> oh yes, floss which you should be doing anyway.
>
>After chewing on fruit has forced sugar-coated fibres down
>between your teeth then it is possible to remove them again
>by laboriously cleaning between each of your teeth using
>dental floss.
>
>However, this is a tedious and time-consuming process. I
>hope you can understand why some people might regard not
>forcing fruit fibres between your teeth in the first place
>as a desirable option.
>
>> "Jucieing" is one of those fad kind of things that sells
>> product on late night infomercials, complete without
>> support for the health benefit assertions made. There are
>> far too many goodies thrown away to make this but a
>> consideration near the bottom of the list for purposes of
>> nutrition.
>
>Supposed throwing away nutrients doesn't seem like that big
>a deal to me.
>
>So - you throw away some fibre and a few fat-soluble
>compounds.
>
>The vast majority still gets ingested. My juicer often
>yeilds 70%-80% by weight of the original produce - and most
>of what is discarded is plainly dominated by fibre.
>
>Fibre is great - but I get plenty of it from the rest
>of my diet.
>
>The cases where discarded nutrients /may/ be a concern is
>in the case of fruit skins. If your juicer discards those
>then you might be better off eating the pulp than drinking
>the resulting juice.
>
>However I'm not advocating juicing such fruit here.
>
>Green leafy vegetables - such as grasses - are plainly
>among the best targets of a juicer. It is mainly access to
>those that make juicers one of the most important bits of
>kitchen paraphenalia.
>--
>__________
> |im |yler
http://timtyler.org/ [email protected] Remove lock
> to reply.