RicodJour wrote:
> On Jun 27, 11:24 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> CAS for announce verdict 7 AM (Eastern) Monday.
>
> Wouldn't that be a **** if he won. I'd love the timing - right before
> the Tour.
There is greater probability that Tom Boonen will win the tour.
On Jun 27, 10:08 am, Fred Fredburger
<[email protected]> wrote:
> RicodJour wrote:
> > On Jun 27, 11:24 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >> CAS for announce verdict 7 AM (Eastern) Monday.
>
> > Wouldn't that be a **** if he won. I'd love the timing - right before
> > the Tour.
>
> There is greater probability that Tom Boonen will win the tour.
Really, you think? What about all the recent rulings from CAS
overturning other doping bans due to improprieties in the testing
process? Don't think they'll apply a similar logic to the Landis case?
[email protected] wrote:
> On Jun 27, 10:08 am, Fred Fredburger
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> RicodJour wrote:
>>> On Jun 27, 11:24 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> CAS for announce verdict 7 AM (Eastern) Monday.
>>> Wouldn't that be a **** if he won. I'd love the timing - right before
>>> the Tour.
>> There is greater probability that Tom Boonen will win the tour.
>
> Really, you think? What about all the recent rulings from CAS
> overturning other doping bans due to improprieties in the testing
> process? Don't think they'll apply a similar logic to the Landis case?
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:38:15 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] wrote:
>On Jun 27, 10:08Â am, Fred Fredburger
><[email protected]> wrote:
>> RicodJour wrote:
>> > On Jun 27, 11:24 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >> CAS for announce verdict 7 AM (Eastern) Monday.
>>
>> > Wouldn't that be a **** if he won. Â I'd love the timing - right before
>> > the Tour.
>>
>> There is greater probability that Tom Boonen will win the tour.
>
>Really, you think? What about all the recent rulings from CAS
>overturning other doping bans due to improprieties in the testing
>process? Don't think they'll apply a similar logic to the Landis case?
No, that guy's an idiot who's wasted tons of everyone's money, he's
gone. If he had just taken it like a man he could be racing the Vuelta
this year.
On Jun 27, 6:39 pm, Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, that guy's an idiot who's wasted tons of everyone's money, he's
> gone. If he had just taken it like a man he could be racing the Vuelta
> this year.
On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:58:42 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] wrote:
>On Jun 27, 6:39 pm, Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> No, that guy's an idiot who's wasted tons of everyone's money, he's
>> gone. If he had just taken it like a man he could be racing the Vuelta
>> this year.
>
>Isn't this true anyway?
Except he's ruined his carreer for good, who on earth is going to hire
such an asshole ?
"Keith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:58:42 -0700 (PDT), [email protected] wrote:
>
>>On Jun 27, 6:39 pm, Keith <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> No, that guy's an idiot who's wasted tons of everyone's money, he's
>>> gone. If he had just taken it like a man he could be racing the Vuelta
>>> this year.
>>
>>Isn't this true anyway?
>
> Except he's ruined his carreer for good, who on earth is going to hire
> such an asshole ?
>
