P
Pat
Guest
> No Pat, I'm not Mr. Dolan. I'm just someone who is totally astonished that you can write something
> so incredibly hypocritical when you yourself are throwing spitballs. For example, when you tell
> someone they are showing their ignorance and need to fix their ignorance or when you tell someone
> they need to read a dictionary and weep, that is exactly the kind of belittling of other people
> you are now objecting to.
I see. So, Ed Dolan says these things countless times to MANY people and yet when one single
person dares to tell him that he is wrong in the same language he uses, that is enough to "totally
astonish" you? I get it now. He should be allowed to rant and rave untrue things and no one should
ever attempt to bring him up short because that would be rude? If you will re-read the posts, you
will see that I wasn't "belittling" a normal person--just one who has been running roughshod over
people without someone calling him to account for it. From your post, I am seeing that you want
everybody to bear his rantings without so much as a peep, and, if someone is actually bold enough
to reply, that reply should be done in a sheeplike manner so as not to offend you. That is what
"astonishes" me. You not only defer to the bully but you then defend him should someone finally
say "enough!"
By the way, none of
> these derogatory statements of you made were even directed at Ed
Dolan-they
> were against other posters. So why do you believe it is okay for you to
do
> it, but not anyone else (and then blame Ed?)
See my remarks above. Evidently you believe everyone should not face up to the bully or they will be
called the same as the bully. Sorry, but it won't wash. Yes, I noticed he was aiming them at other
posters. But, this is not his own private website and I got tired of him highjacking it for his
stupid means. Someone has to stand up against the bully. I see it will never be you.
Don't you even notice your
> hypocrisy (or are you a politician)? No you are not in Ed's category, you are in a category all to
> yourself.
It is amazing to me that you would bash somebody merely for standing up to a bully. Don't you notice
your own lack of guts? Yes, you are in a category all to yourself---a category of one person who
likes and supports bullies.
By the way, for you to say anyone is
> grossly mistaken is also incorrect. As I noted in another post, the US government classifies
> itself as "Constitution-based federal republic;
strong
> democratic tradition" ref http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/2128.html
yeah, and that is a democracy. He absolutely said that this country is NOT a democracy in any way
shape or from. So, he is wrong. S0 are you.
Pat in TX
> so incredibly hypocritical when you yourself are throwing spitballs. For example, when you tell
> someone they are showing their ignorance and need to fix their ignorance or when you tell someone
> they need to read a dictionary and weep, that is exactly the kind of belittling of other people
> you are now objecting to.
I see. So, Ed Dolan says these things countless times to MANY people and yet when one single
person dares to tell him that he is wrong in the same language he uses, that is enough to "totally
astonish" you? I get it now. He should be allowed to rant and rave untrue things and no one should
ever attempt to bring him up short because that would be rude? If you will re-read the posts, you
will see that I wasn't "belittling" a normal person--just one who has been running roughshod over
people without someone calling him to account for it. From your post, I am seeing that you want
everybody to bear his rantings without so much as a peep, and, if someone is actually bold enough
to reply, that reply should be done in a sheeplike manner so as not to offend you. That is what
"astonishes" me. You not only defer to the bully but you then defend him should someone finally
say "enough!"
By the way, none of
> these derogatory statements of you made were even directed at Ed
Dolan-they
> were against other posters. So why do you believe it is okay for you to
do
> it, but not anyone else (and then blame Ed?)
See my remarks above. Evidently you believe everyone should not face up to the bully or they will be
called the same as the bully. Sorry, but it won't wash. Yes, I noticed he was aiming them at other
posters. But, this is not his own private website and I got tired of him highjacking it for his
stupid means. Someone has to stand up against the bully. I see it will never be you.
Don't you even notice your
> hypocrisy (or are you a politician)? No you are not in Ed's category, you are in a category all to
> yourself.
It is amazing to me that you would bash somebody merely for standing up to a bully. Don't you notice
your own lack of guts? Yes, you are in a category all to yourself---a category of one person who
likes and supports bullies.
By the way, for you to say anyone is
> grossly mistaken is also incorrect. As I noted in another post, the US government classifies
> itself as "Constitution-based federal republic;
strong
> democratic tradition" ref http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/fields/2128.html
yeah, and that is a democracy. He absolutely said that this country is NOT a democracy in any way
shape or from. So, he is wrong. S0 are you.
Pat in TX