Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Keith Bontragers on 31.8 handlebars

Started by Llatikcuf · · Last activity · 2 posts · 320 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
11 August 2005
Last activity
11 August 2005
Original author
Llatikcuf
Posts
2
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
320
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–2 of 2
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. Did anyone else see this? Sorry, it's kind of long.

    From:
    http://www.cyclingnews.com/tech.php?id=tech/2004/features/bontrager

    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

    CN: 31.8mm handlebar clamps. Did the world really need yet another bike
    component 'standard'?

    KB: Yes and no.

    I agree with you in one respect; there are too many handlebar clamp
    dimension standards as it is. It's a mess.

    But that is an old problem. Cinelli and the other established road bar
    manufacturers started it and carried on with it, though they could have
    simplified it at any point easily. The cycling world has had to live
    with it for a long time. In the short term the new standard adds a
    little additional complexity to fitting bars and stems to a bike,
    though it is not as subtle or dangerous as the 26.0/26.4 issue.

    There is a brighter side to it though. It opens up some possibilities
    for developing new handlebars and it could simplify stem and handlebar
    standards eventually too. In the future road and MTB bars, stems and
    forks can have the same dimensions at the points at which they connect
    to the bike. Finding the stem you want is more likely since dealers can
    stock more sizes and angles because they don't have to stock parts in
    all of the clamp standards. Finding parts that conform to the older
    standards will still be a breeze on Ebay.

    One aspect of the new standard seems to be a bit grim though. (This is
    where I get to hop up on my old soapbox for a little ranting - you knew
    I would, eh?)

    There were some broken bars and stems in the Tour this year, one in a
    sprint that was pretty messy. There has also been a lot of chatter
    about using precise torque meters on stem clamp fasteners in order to
    avoid damaging lightweight handlebars, damage that I have seen happen
    fairly often in the field. I think there is a connection.

    Product designers and engineers need to understand what is and what is
    not possible (or maybe what is and what is not a good idea is a better
    way to say it) when they are designing parts to the new standard,
    especially when the parts are delivered to anyone who wants one instead
    of careful, professional mechanics. The larger diameter/thinner wall
    approach that works so well on frames is not always a good one on bars.
    Stems that have been trimmed to a minimum create very small contact
    areas between the bars and the clamp. An overzealous application of a
    wrench (something that is inevitable in spite of warning labels and
    lectures from dealers) is going to lead to damaged, and eventually to
    broken handlebars. That is not something the world needs.

  2. Sorry, Bontrager not Bontragers

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.