Ken Papai Where Are You???

[HC]

http://www.kenpapai.com/

 

[Donald Munro]

HC wrote:

> http://www.kenpapai.com/

He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.

 

[Fred Fredburger]

Donald Munro wrote:
> HC wrote:
>
>> http://www.kenpapai.com/
>
> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.

Talk about being over-caffeinated!

 

[Donald Munro]

HC wrote:
>>> http://www.kenpapai.com/

Donald Munro wrote:
>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.

Fred Fredburger wrote:
> Talk about being over-caffeinated!

Starbucks Supersized Suppository.

 

[Tom Kunich]

"Donald Munro" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> HC wrote:
>>>> http://www.kenpapai.com/
>
> Donald Munro wrote:
>>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
>
> Fred Fredburger wrote:
>> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
>
> Starbucks Supersized Suppository.

It really hurts you guys to know that he's at least a hundred times better
than you at just about everything doesn't it?

 

[Howard Kveck]

In article <[email protected]>,
Fred Fredburger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Donald Munro wrote:
> > HC wrote:
> >>>> http://www.kenpapai.com/
> >
> > Donald Munro wrote:
> >>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
> >
> > Fred Fredburger wrote:
> >> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
> >
> > Starbucks Supersized Suppository.
> >
>
> I think I get your meaning. How long ago was that "Sausalito Starbucks"
> comment? If someone hung around a Starbucks THAT long, their entire body
> would become pure caffeine. Presumably suitable for use as some else's
> suppository.
>
> Now we'd just need to find a big enough asshole...

That's a rhetorical statement, isn't it?

--
tanx,
Howard

Now it's raining pitchforks and women,
But I've already got a pitchfork...

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?

 

[Mike Jacoubowsky]

"Fred Fredburger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Donald Munro wrote:
>> HC wrote:
>>>>> http://www.kenpapai.com/
>>
>> Donald Munro wrote:
>>>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
>>
>> Fred Fredburger wrote:
>>> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
>>
>> Starbucks Supersized Suppository.
>>
>
> I think I get your meaning. How long ago was that "Sausalito Starbucks"
> comment? If someone hung around a Starbucks THAT long, their entire body
> would become pure caffeine.

That might not happen at Peets. At our Los Altos store, we now have a
Starbucks and a Peets right across from each other, within 50-100 yards of
our store. I prefer the coffee at Peets, but it takes FOREVER, even when
there are only a couple people in line in front of you. They even play
Baroque music. Which is fine, I suppose, if I wanted a nice, soothing tea.
But if I want CAFFEINE, I likely want it NOW! I don't go to a coffee shop
for a bucolic experience.

Aside from all that, I do miss Ken's posts. He seemed like a good guy.

--Mike-- Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReactionBicycles.com

 

[Michael Press]

In article
<[email protected]>,
Fred Fredburger
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Donald Munro wrote:
> > HC wrote:
> >>>> http://www.kenpapai.com/
> >
> > Donald Munro wrote:
> >>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
> >
> > Fred Fredburger wrote:
> >> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
> >
> > Starbucks Supersized Suppository.
> >
>
> I think I get your meaning. How long ago was that "Sausalito Starbucks"
> comment? If someone hung around a Starbucks THAT long, their entire body
> would become pure caffeine. Presumably suitable for use as some else's
> suppository.
>
> Now we'd just need to find a big enough asshole...

Aw yer just trollin' for somebody to give a URL to goatse. DIY.

--
Michael Press

 

[Bill C]

On Jan 6, 11:58 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "Fred Fredburger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>
> news:[email protected]...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Donald Munro wrote:
> >> HC wrote:
> >>>>>http://www.kenpapai.com/
>
> >> Donald Munro wrote:
> >>>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
>
> >> Fred Fredburger wrote:
> >>> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
>
> >> Starbucks Supersized Suppository.
>
> > I think I get your meaning. How long ago was that "Sausalito Starbucks"
> > comment? If someone hung around a Starbucks THAT long, their entire body
> > would become pure caffeine.
>
> That might not happen at Peets. At our Los Altos store, we now have a
> Starbucks and a Peets right across from each other, within 50-100 yards of
> our store. I prefer the coffee at Peets, but it takes FOREVER, even when
> there are only a couple people in line in front of you. They even play
> Baroque music. Which is fine, I suppose, if I wanted a nice, soothing tea.
> But if I want CAFFEINE, I likely want it NOW!  I don't go to a coffee shop
> for a bucolic experience.
>
> Aside from all that, I do miss Ken's posts. He seemed like a good guy.
>
> --Mike--     Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yeah, He's also got tons of stuff going on outside RBR, but used to
get ****** at the OT stuff here, and me in particular, but I think he
would've enjoyed the fine potables discussions, and the much reduced
nastiness around here these days.
Great guy, fun to talk with, and a genuinely nice human being IMO.
Yes, I want his love child.
Bill C

 

[Ryan Cousineau]

In article
<f621d3ae-c1e1-4701-a92b-e8572c93432f@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
Bill C <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Jan 6, 11:58 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > "Fred Fredburger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Donald Munro wrote:
> > >> HC wrote:
> > >>>>>http://www.kenpapai.com/
> >
> > >> Donald Munro wrote:
> > >>>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
> >
> > >> Fred Fredburger wrote:
> > >>> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
> >
> > >> Starbucks Supersized Suppository.
> >
> > > I think I get your meaning. How long ago was that "Sausalito Starbucks"
> > > comment? If someone hung around a Starbucks THAT long, their entire body
> > > would become pure caffeine.
> >
> > That might not happen at Peets. At our Los Altos store, we now have a
> > Starbucks and a Peets right across from each other, within 50-100 yards of
> > our store. I prefer the coffee at Peets, but it takes FOREVER, even when
> > there are only a couple people in line in front of you. They even play
> > Baroque music. Which is fine, I suppose, if I wanted a nice, soothing tea.
> > But if I want CAFFEINE, I likely want it NOW!  I don't go to a coffee shop
> > for a bucolic experience.
> >
> > Aside from all that, I do miss Ken's posts. He seemed like a good guy.
> >
> > --Mike--     Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com- Hide
> > quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Yeah, He's also got tons of stuff going on outside RBR, but used to
> get ****** at the OT stuff here, and me in particular, but I think he
> would've enjoyed the fine potables discussions, and the much reduced
> nastiness around here these days.
> Great guy, fun to talk with, and a genuinely nice human being IMO.
> Yes, I want his love child.
> Bill C

It's BETTER now?!?!

You people must have just been the Famous People Players after a few too
many beers if that was the case.

--
Ryan Cousineau [email protected] http://www.wiredcola.com/
"My scenarios may give the impression I could be an excellent crook.
Not true - I am a talented lawyer." - Sandy in rec.bicycles.racing

 

[Fred Fredburger]

Michael Press wrote:
> In article
> <[email protected]>,
> Fred Fredburger
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Donald Munro wrote:
>>> HC wrote:
>>>>>> http://www.kenpapai.com/
>>> Donald Munro wrote:
>>>>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
>>> Fred Fredburger wrote:
>>>> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
>>> Starbucks Supersized Suppository.
>>>
>> I think I get your meaning. How long ago was that "Sausalito Starbucks"
>> comment? If someone hung around a Starbucks THAT long, their entire body
>> would become pure caffeine. Presumably suitable for use as some else's
>> suppository.
>>
>> Now we'd just need to find a big enough asshole...
>
> Aw yer just trollin' for somebody to give a URL to goatse. DIY.
>

That actually hadn't occurred to me. Tip 'o the hat for the thought,
however. Nice job of getting the idea across without actually inflicting
the link on me. I sincerely appreciate it.

 

[Davey Crockett]

Ryan Cousineau a écrit profondement:

| In article
| <f621d3ae-c1e1-4701-a92b-e8572c93432f@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
| Bill C <[email protected]> wrote:
|
| > On Jan 6, 11:58 pm, "Mike Jacoubowsky" <[email protected]> wrote:
| > > "Fred Fredburger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
| > >
| > > news:[email protected]...
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > >
| > > > Donald Munro wrote:
| > > >> HC wrote:
| > > >>>>>http://www.kenpapai.com/
| > >
| > > >> Donald Munro wrote:
| > > >>>> He's still waiting at that Starbucks in Sausalito.
| > >
| > > >> Fred Fredburger wrote:
| > > >>> Talk about being over-caffeinated!
| > >
| > > >> Starbucks Supersized Suppository.
| > >
| > > > I think I get your meaning. How long ago was that "Sausalito Starbucks"
| > > > comment? If someone hung around a Starbucks THAT long, their entire body
| > > > would become pure caffeine.
| > >
| > > That might not happen at Peets. At our Los Altos store, we now have a
| > > Starbucks and a Peets right across from each other, within 50-100 yards of
| > > our store. I prefer the coffee at Peets, but it takes FOREVER, even when
| > > there are only a couple people in line in front of you. They even play
| > > Baroque music. Which is fine, I suppose, if I wanted a nice, soothing tea.
| > > But if I want CAFFEINE, I likely want it NOW!  I don't go to a coffee shop
| > > for a bucolic experience.
| > >
| > > Aside from all that, I do miss Ken's posts. He seemed like a good guy.
| > >
| > > --Mike--     Chain Reaction Bicycleswww.ChainReactionBicycles.com- Hide
| > > quoted text -
| > >
| > > - Show quoted text -
| >
| > Yeah, He's also got tons of stuff going on outside RBR, but used to
| > get ****** at the OT stuff here, and me in particular, but I think he
| > would've enjoyed the fine potables discussions, and the much reduced
| > nastiness around here these days.
| > Great guy, fun to talk with, and a genuinely nice human being IMO.
| > Yes, I want his love child.
| > Bill C
|
| It's BETTER now?!?!
|
| You people must have just been the Famous People Players after a few too
| many beers if that was the case.


Learn netiquette

http://info.borland.com/newsgroups/netiquette.html

--
Davey Crockett
-
Driving a Stake through the
Heart of the Politically Correct

 

[Ted van de Weteringe]

Davey Crockett wrote:
> Learn netiquette

You channeling Ken now? What the hell did Ryan do wrong, in your view?
Can't be quoting all text because you did that too.

 

[Davey Crockett]

Ted van de Weteringe a écrit profondement:

| Davey Crockett wrote:
| > Learn netiquette
|
| You channeling Ken now? What the hell did Ryan do wrong, in your view?
| Can't be quoting all text because you did that too.

Davey was making a point by leaving all the extraneous **** in that
post.

Firstly that uncropped type of post is at best annoying and at worst
impossible to determine to what point the responder was responding.

And further, much of the world still pays directly for bandwidth, as
opposed to paying indirectly which everyone does, and gets hurt in the
pocket through having to download spurious ****.

--
Davey Crockett
-
Happy Marching Looting and Killing Days
Just read up on the Piece of **** the holiday's all about:
http://www.martinlutherking.org/

 

[Tom Kunich]

"Davey Crockett" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Ted van de Weteringe a écrit profondement:
>
> | Davey Crockett wrote:
> | > Learn netiquette
> |
> | You channeling Ken now? What the hell did Ryan do wrong, in your view?
> | Can't be quoting all text because you did that too.
>
> Davey was making a point by leaving all the extraneous **** in that
> post.
>
> Firstly that uncropped type of post is at best annoying and at worst
> impossible to determine to what point the responder was responding.
>
> And further, much of the world still pays directly for bandwidth, as
> opposed to paying indirectly which everyone does, and gets hurt in the
> pocket through having to download spurious ****.

You are completely correct Davey which means you're fighting an uphill
battle with moronville.

 

[Michael Press]

In article <[email protected]>,
Davey Crockett <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ted van de Weteringe a écrit profondement:
>
> | Davey Crockett wrote:
> | > Learn netiquette
> |
> | You channeling Ken now? What the hell did Ryan do wrong, in your view?
> | Can't be quoting all text because you did that too.
>
> Davey was making a point by leaving all the extraneous **** in that
> post.
>
> Firstly that uncropped type of post is at best annoying and at worst
> impossible to determine to what point the responder was responding.
>
> And further, much of the world still pays directly for bandwidth, as
> opposed to paying indirectly which everyone does, and gets hurt in the
> pocket through having to download spurious ****.

Then you could ****-can the political nasty-grams out of
your signatures. Up until now the niceties of usenet
article composition have been studiously ignored in rbr,
and not out of ignorance. Is this a new dawn?

--
Michael Press

 

[Howard Kveck]

In article <[email protected]>, Davey Crockett <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Ted van de Weteringe a écrit profondement:
>
> | Davey Crockett wrote:
> | > Learn netiquette
> |
> | You channeling Ken now? What the hell did Ryan do wrong, in your view?
> | Can't be quoting all text because you did that too.
>
> Davey was making a point by leaving all the extraneous **** in that
> post.
>
> Firstly that uncropped type of post is at best annoying and at worst
> impossible to determine to what point the responder was responding.
>
> And further, much of the world still pays directly for bandwidth, as
> opposed to paying indirectly which everyone does, and gets hurt in the
> pocket through having to download spurious ****.

STFU

--
tanx,
Howard

Now it's raining pitchforks and women,
But I've already got a pitchfork...

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?