Kilroy Silk Quits



Carrera

New Member
Feb 2, 2004
4,856
0
0
56
After a devastating election defeat, Kilroy Silk has quit Veritas and sees little point in continuing his political party. Kilroy stated:
"It was clear from the general election result - and more recently that of the Cheadle by-election - that the electors are content with the old parties and that it would be virtually impossible for a new party to make a significant impact given the nature of our electoral system. We tried and failed."
The strange thing here is that both Kilroy Silk and George Galloway are both extremists within the current political field (it seems to me). Kilroy is extreme right-wing while Galloway represents the extreme left. Yet Galloway has done very well in the elections and, of the two, has been able to bruise Blair.
At the same time as the U.K. has turned towards left-wing, liberal politicians we can see the opposite in the U.S. That's kind of ironic. It will be very difficult now for the Democrats to gain political ground within the U.S.A. (where evangelical values, right-wing views have become so strong). Likewise, parties such as Kilroy Silk or even the Tories will find it almost impossible to make any impression within this country.
The absence of competing viewpoints and a wide range of dynamic political parties within the U.K. and the U.S. is worrying. We are somehow moving towards a one-party-state or oligarchic political regime where a minority group of of right-wing or left-wing extremists is allowed to legislate with near impunity.
Kind of reminds me of the staleness so evident in the Chernenko years within Moscow.
 
Carrera said:
We are somehow moving towards a one-party-state or oligarchic political regime where a minority group of of right-wing or left-wing extremists is allowed to legislate with near impunity.

The right-wing is firmly entrenched in the UK, Blair's policies have very little to do with socialism. Privatising the British Nuclear industry (one of Blair's pet projects) is definitely *not* socialist. As for Respect and Galloway, a party with one seat is extremely unlikely to change British legislation. It's the majority stupid ! :)

I find it rather bizarre that you allude to Galloway being an "extremist".
 
I see Kilroy and Galloway as both being extremists but at totally opposite sides of the fence. Seeing as left-wing policy seems to be in and right-wing policy out, Kilroy and the Tories have beat a big retreat.
But I do find it odd that although Kilroy Silk expressed extreme views when he lost his job at the BBC, many other people have now gone on to do exactly the same thing (yet far worse) after the London attacks. We're seeing hysterical headlines in the tabloids at present and, in some ways, its feeding peoples' hostilities.
I mean, the Sun, the Mail and the Express are really pulling no punches and going for the jugular.
I guess I have to laugh as the only political figure I totally see eye to eye with in this country is Marc Roche of LE MONDE who appears on Dateline London. The thing is, he's French, pro-European, anti-Turkey E.U. membership and he doesn't like George W Bush. Guess I'd vote for him :)

darkboong said:
The right-wing is firmly entrenched in the UK, Blair's policies have very little to do with socialism. Privatising the British Nuclear industry (one of Blair's pet projects) is definitely *not* socialist. As for Respect and Galloway, a party with one seat is extremely unlikely to change British legislation. It's the majority stupid ! :)

I find it rather bizarre that you allude to Galloway being an "extremist".