Cycling Equipment · Public discussion

Kona 2004 Jake the Snake - user reports?

Started by Kinky Cowboy · · Last activity · 5 posts · 984 views

Thread details

What we know about this thread

Original section
Cycling Equipment
Published
10 March 2005
Last activity
12 March 2005
Original author
Kinky Cowboy
Posts
5
Discussion status
Public discussion
Total views
984
Views / 30 days
0

The navigation and discussion metadata provide context. Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Showing posts 1–5 of 5
Posts remain in their original chronological order.

Text size
  1. My LBS has 2004 Jake the Snakes for the price of 2005 Jakes. Obviously
    the posh old bike is a better buy than the basic new one, but is it
    suitable for what I want it for - 50 mile urban assaults in about 3
    hours? (I have a job delivering blood samples into a lab in central
    London, and I can save some diesel and get in some training by
    swapping from van to bike in the outer suburbs) I know I'll have to
    change the tyres, any other comments or suggested alternatives
    welcome.

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

  2. Kinky Cowboy said:

    My LBS has 2004 Jake the Snakes for the price of 2005 Jakes. Obviously
    the posh old bike is a better buy than the basic new one, but is it
    suitable for what I want it for - 50 mile urban assaults in about 3
    hours?

    I have a 2003 (the green one) that I train on for MTB racing. It makes a
    great, durable road bike. I have put approximately 1000 pavement
    training hours on it in all conditions (lots of heavy rain rides through
    Vancouver winters) and think very highly of it. Two hard crashes in the
    rain give it (and me) that lived in look, but it works as well now as
    when new. The only non cosmetic damage sustained was a bent derailleur
    hanger which the tech salvaged both times. Levers and bars got pushed
    around too, but even I could fix that. I like to crash on the right side
    I guess.

    Changes from stock are:
    Tires, seat and post, pedals, full fenders, LED front and rear, cycle
    computer, consumables (chain, brake pads, bar tape)

    If your 'assault' fails any time over the next several years, assuming
    the '04 is similar to the '03, it won't be the bikes fault.

  3. Kinky Cowboy said:

    My LBS has 2004 Jake the Snakes for the price of 2005 Jakes.


    Obviously

    Quoted message said:

    the posh old bike is a better buy than the basic new one, but is it
    suitable for what I want it for - 50 mile urban assaults in about 3
    hours? (I have a job delivering blood samples into a lab in central
    London, and I can save some diesel and get in some training by
    swapping from van to bike in the outer suburbs) I know I'll have to
    change the tyres, any other comments or suggested alternatives
    welcome.


    Second hand experience for a different year of this bike. I rode a 200
    kilometer brevet a few years ago and one of the riders had the Kona
    Jake Snake bike. I had seen him on a few other brevets and knew the
    bike would have no affect on his speed. So you would not be the only
    person to think the bike was more than ridable on paved roads for long
    rides. The above brevet rider did bring out his more traditional road
    bike for the very hilly 300 km brevet a few weeks later. The Jake
    Snake is OK for short 125 mile rides, but maybe not the best when you
    have 180 miles of hills.

  4. Kinky Cowboy said:

    My LBS has 2004 Jake the Snakes for the price of 2005 Jakes. Obviously
    the posh old bike is a better buy than the basic new one, but is it
    suitable for what I want it for - 50 mile urban assaults in about 3
    hours? (I have a job delivering blood samples into a lab in central
    London, and I can save some diesel and get in some training by
    swapping from van to bike in the outer suburbs) I know I'll have to
    change the tyres, any other comments or suggested alternatives
    welcome.

    I have owned a 2000 Kona Jake-the-Snake for 3+ years now. I use it
    regularly for commuting and road riding, and have also ridden it
    (unloaded) from San Francisco to Los Angeles. I love the bike; it
    sounds like it would be a great ride for your needs too.

    Greg
    --
    Gregory S. Sutter "How do I read this file?"
    [email hidden] "You uudecode it."
    http://zer0.org/~gsutter/ "I I I decode it?"

  5. On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:07:45 +0000, Kinky Cowboy <[email hidden]>

    Quoted message said:

    My LBS has 2004 Jake the Snakes for the price of 2005 Jakes. Obviously
    the posh old bike is a better buy than the basic new one, but is it
    suitable for what I want it for - I know I'll have to
    change the tyres, any other comments or suggested alternatives
    welcome.

    Thanks for the feedback, looks like you guys like your JtSs.

    I'm picking mine up from th shop next week, and I've ordered a pair of
    the ridiculously cheap Shimano R500 wheels with 23c tyres for fast
    road work. Two bikes for less the price of one :-)

    Kinky Cowboy*

    *Batteries not included
    May contain traces of nuts
    Your milage may vary

Active in the last 60 minutes

Active in this thread

0 users · 0 guests ·0 bots ·0 total

No signed-in users are active right now.

No known search crawlers active right now.