WillemJM said:Lance is not a criminal, I believe we need to keep apples with apples. The guy is a thorougobred race horse, will do all that is necessary to win. That is a typical top fighter pilot profile. The entire peleton had a immatra back then. Did I go a little faster than the posted limit on my way to work today, breaking the rules like most of us do? Again, this would not be comparing apples with apples in a competitive environment where all his top competitors were doing much the same thing.
Yes, it's better to stand for nothing and keep quiet. Surely that must be the way things get better.WillemJM said:I believe at this stage Le-Mond is the only successful cycling athlete really judging Lance for the worst. Personally I don't judge others, I don't make it my business to study the dirtly laundry of others to the detail where the entire process and situation is understood. In the pack of dogs where we all run happily together, lifting our legs high, until one falls down, then all jump in to get their bite, I leave the pack. I respect the guy for what he achieved and his ability, accept that back then things were different, it was a long time ago and things are changing for the better. I hope he finds peace in his current dilemma. Flame me if you wish, but were it me I probably would have kept quiet, layed low and tried something else, like racing on two wheels with a motor providing the power this time.
Some folks think it's the cheating part everyone's all in a huff about. And while some certainly are, it's really just the part above that some others take affront with. I was not aware he had sued O'reiily.Originally Posted by alienator .
...many cycling champions won, even if they doped, without going to the extreme of slandering people, suing them, threatening them, and ruining their careers.
+1Originally Posted by alienator .
Yes, it's better to stand for nothing and keep quiet. Surely that must be the way things get better.
Cycling's not dead, and in case you've completely missed the point, the Armstrong is about way more than just his doping. His doping pales in comparison to his bullying, his threats, the careers he ruined, his lawsuits, his slander, his likely payoffs, and the size of his doping conspiracy. There are and have been, even in those evil '90's pros who didn't dope. If for no other reason, it's for those people and their refusal to dope that it's worth continuing to be fans of cycling racing. That was just about cycling as organized competition. As anyone with half a brain knows, cycling is so much bigger than pro racing or bike racing of any sort. I'd wager that very few people will be dissuaded from cycling or so discouraged that they give up cycling just because of what pros do.coneofsilence said:Cycling is dead. Let it be. Cycling can not repair itself. People were cheating before Lance, People will continue to cheat after Lance. Â
It'll be a big year for Sagan. He'll win at least one of the Classics.danfoz said:Boo hoo hoo, my ass. I am totally excited for 2013 calendar year of bicycle racing action. Sagan's gonna crush, Cav is gonna try deny, Gilbert has hopefully not seen his swan song and we'll be privy to a battle royale a la Bernie vs. Greg against Mutton chops Wiggo and Froomey soap opera style. So, who still needs the WHAA-mbulance?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.