J
Donn Deniston writes:
>> He needs another new drug to win another Tour de France. His
>> previous drug dopping was now revealed in the laboratory. He could
>> be caught if he tried the dopping. So Lance needs other dopping
>> method to win another Tour De France. Good luck drug addict.
> The biggest dope I see here is you.
You must mean "dopp" because who else would be dopping (sic).
Although the writer jumps to the conclusion that Lance is doping with
a more than justified manner with no evidence other than Lance's
extraordinary performance. I felt uneasy when Lance was interviewed
on US TV about claims often made in the European press that it could
not be possible without drugs. Lance answered in a cagey manner and
ill at ease as I saw it. He said "I don't use BANNED substances."
with emphasis on the "banned". I was disappointed that the
interviewer did not pursue that claim further or clarify what was
meant by that qualification. It seemed apparent to me that Lance was
not saying that he used no performance enhancing chemistry but only
that it had not been banned. I don't know that Lance allowed such
interviews in Europe where I suspect that he would not get off as easy
because over there it is widely claimed that he is using something
that may not yet have come under drug test scrutiny.
Time will probably reveal what if anything is involved. I certainly
would like to see the cloud over his success be cleared.
[email protected]
>> He needs another new drug to win another Tour de France. His
>> previous drug dopping was now revealed in the laboratory. He could
>> be caught if he tried the dopping. So Lance needs other dopping
>> method to win another Tour De France. Good luck drug addict.
> The biggest dope I see here is you.
You must mean "dopp" because who else would be dopping (sic).
Although the writer jumps to the conclusion that Lance is doping with
a more than justified manner with no evidence other than Lance's
extraordinary performance. I felt uneasy when Lance was interviewed
on US TV about claims often made in the European press that it could
not be possible without drugs. Lance answered in a cagey manner and
ill at ease as I saw it. He said "I don't use BANNED substances."
with emphasis on the "banned". I was disappointed that the
interviewer did not pursue that claim further or clarify what was
meant by that qualification. It seemed apparent to me that Lance was
not saying that he used no performance enhancing chemistry but only
that it had not been banned. I don't know that Lance allowed such
interviews in Europe where I suspect that he would not get off as easy
because over there it is widely claimed that he is using something
that may not yet have come under drug test scrutiny.
Time will probably reveal what if anything is involved. I certainly
would like to see the cloud over his success be cleared.
[email protected]