Gee... I'm amazed at the people who have queued up to give their $0.02 worth on this thread. But if
you feel like flaming, then good on you... that's the freedom of the internet. FWIW, I do realise we
are in the 21st century, but there are still those of us who like to watch a sporting event on the
telly without knowing who won it. Makes it that bit more exciting, no? All I'm asking for is the
same netiquette that applies to things like posts re: movies & tv shows, where giving away the plot
twists in the subject line is considered very bad form. I certainly share your admiration for Lance,
but I was pretty miffed at getting a "heads-up" that he had done something studly before I had
watched the stage.
> Wow Dave you really do need to lighten up. When I wrote this peiece it was nearly 24 hours since
> it happened. This is the 21st century buddy - the age of the information super highway. Sounds to
> me you are either a resident medical officer whose just come off a 48 hour shift or one of those
> bike couriers who've been discussing how hard they work on another thread here. Either way, I was
> talking about a super effort, and I think others share my admiration for such a great sportsman -
> he may be ruthless, but he is good.
>
> And by the way Phil Liggett did not say JU should not have stopped, he simply posed the question
> for his readers to consider.
>
> If it stops raining I'm going for a ride. See ya Dave.
Have a great ride
After all, that's what it's all about.