Lance still worlds # 1 cheater!

"Lance_Cheats" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

It is so obvious that Lance Armstrong is and has been cheating his
entire career.

Can anyone in their right mind tell me how it is possible to beat
someone like Millar who has now admitted to 'some EPO' use but more than
likely just a fraction of the real EPO use that he actually did if
you're not using some other performance enhancing methods or substances
that aren't banned by the UCI?

Millar should come clean all the way and just say 'Yep, I use it, my
teammates use it, the peloton uses it all the time and still somehow,
someway Lance Armstrong who has never used it is able to beat us and
that's the thing we can't figure out."

The real problem is the UCI because if they cleaned out the sport there
would only be a handful of CAT 3's from Iowa and North Dakota and the
sponsorship money and thus the commisioners fees would drop to $0.

Didn't Andy Hampsten come from North Dakota. So, are you really Andy
posting under a nom de plume?

"Lance_Cheats" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

It is so obvious that Lance Armstrong is and has been cheating his
entire career.

Can anyone in their right mind tell me how it is possible to beat
someone like Millar who has now admitted to 'some EPO' use but more than
likely just a fraction of the real EPO use that he actually did if
you're not using some other performance enhancing methods or substances
that aren't banned by the UCI?

Millar should come clean all the way and just say 'Yep, I use it, my
teammates use it, the peloton uses it all the time and still somehow,
someway Lance Armstrong who has never used it is able to beat us and
that's the thing we can't figure out."

The real problem is the UCI because if they cleaned out the sport there
would only be a handful of CAT 3's from Iowa and North Dakota and the
sponsorship money and thus the commisioners fees would drop to $0.

There are no ethics in any sport anymore, just win at any cost and
collect the prize at the finish line.

Doping or no doping, Lance is a genetic freak. I know that, when Lance has
been tested in physical performance labs, he's off the charts. He's a very
rare physical specimen. Having said that, I realize I'm regurgitating stuff
I probably read in one of his books. I wonder ... if Lance won in court and
got to put a disclaimer in Walsh's book, I wonder if Walsh could sue and get
one put in Lance's books?

Bob C.

"B. Lafferty" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<[email hidden]>...

Quoted message said:

"Lance_Cheats" <[email hidden]> wrote in message
news:[email hidden]...

Quoted message said:

It is so obvious that Lance Armstrong is and has been cheating his
entire career.

Can anyone in their right mind tell me how it is possible to beat
someone like Millar who has now admitted to 'some EPO' use but more than
likely just a fraction of the real EPO use that he actually did if
you're not using some other performance enhancing methods or substances
that aren't banned by the UCI?

Millar should come clean all the way and just say 'Yep, I use it, my
teammates use it, the peloton uses it all the time and still somehow,
someway Lance Armstrong who has never used it is able to beat us and
that's the thing we can't figure out."

The real problem is the UCI because if they cleaned out the sport there
would only be a handful of CAT 3's from Iowa and North Dakota and the
sponsorship money and thus the commisioners fees would drop to $0.

Didn't Andy Hampsten come from North Dakota. So, are you really Andy
posting under a nom de plume?

Sounds like Lafferty has a puppet.......now if he could just learn to
do it without his mouth moving he could take it on the road. !

"OMC"