Landis documents available

[dbrower]

FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
introductions, initial comments, indexes,
and a linkable file for every page is available at:

http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm

-dB

l

 

[dbrower]

dbrower wrote:
> FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
> introductions, initial comments, indexes,
> and a linkable file for every page is available at:
>
> http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm

That would be:

http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.html

with an l at the end.

drat.

-dB

 

[[email protected]]

dbrower wrote:
> dbrower wrote:
> > FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
> > introductions, initial comments, indexes,
> > and a linkable file for every page is available at:
> >
> > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm
>
> That would be:
>
> http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.html
>
> with an l at the end.
>
> drat.
>
> -dB

No, a capitol L at the end.

 

[[email protected]]

[email protected] wrote:
> dbrower wrote:
> > dbrower wrote:
> > > FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
> > > introductions, initial comments, indexes,
> > > and a linkable file for every page is available at:
> > >
> > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm
> >
> > That would be:
> >
> > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.html
> >
> > with an l at the end.
> >
> > drat.
> >
> > -dB
>
> No, a capitol L at the end.


BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!

 

[[email protected]]

[email protected] wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > dbrower wrote:
> > > dbrower wrote:
> > > > FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
> > > > introductions, initial comments, indexes,
> > > > and a linkable file for every page is available at:
> > > >
> > > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm
> > >
> > > That would be:
> > >
> > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.html
> > >
> > > with an l at the end.
> > >
> > > drat.
> > >
> > > -dB
> >
> > No, a capitol L at the end.
>
>
> BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!

 

[[email protected]]

[email protected] wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > [email protected] wrote:
> > > dbrower wrote:
> > > > dbrower wrote:
> > > > > FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
> > > > > introductions, initial comments, indexes,
> > > > > and a linkable file for every page is available at:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm
> > > >
> > > > That would be:
> > > >
> > > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.html
> > > >
> > > > with an l at the end.
> > > >
> > > > drat.
> > > >
> > > > -dB
> > >
> > > No, a capitol L at the end.
> >
> >
> > BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!

BTW. The slide show is hilarious!! It looks like Floyd's step-daughter
Ryan did her 7th grade science project.

 

[[email protected]]

That's because the target audience of the presentation is someone who
is not a scientist, ass face.

Do you think that the presentation would be effective in achieving its
end of influencing public opinion if it was written for a "smart guy"
like you...?


[email protected] wrote:
> [email protected] wrote:
> > [email protected] wrote:
> > > [email protected] wrote:
> > > > dbrower wrote:
> > > > > dbrower wrote:
> > > > > > FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
> > > > > > introductions, initial comments, indexes,
> > > > > > and a linkable file for every page is available at:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm
> > > > >
> > > > > That would be:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.html
> > > > >
> > > > > with an l at the end.
> > > > >
> > > > > drat.
> > > > >
> > > > > -dB
> > > >
> > > > No, a capitol L at the end.
> > >
> > >
> > > BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!
>
> BTW. The slide show is hilarious!! It looks like Floyd's step-daughter
> Ryan did her 7th grade science project.

 

[RonSonic]

On 12 Oct 2006 03:40:58 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>That's because the target audience of the presentation is someone who
>is not a scientist, ass face.
>
>Do you think that the presentation would be effective in achieving its
>end of influencing public opinion if it was written for a "smart guy"
>like you...?

Not enough potty words for a guy like duped.

Ron


>
>[email protected] wrote:
>> [email protected] wrote:
>> > [email protected] wrote:
>> > > [email protected] wrote:
>> > > > dbrower wrote:
>> > > > > dbrower wrote:
>> > > > > > FL.com posted the documents. A complete mirror set, with
>> > > > > > introductions, initial comments, indexes,
>> > > > > > and a linkable file for every page is available at:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.htm
>> > > > >
>> > > > > That would be:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > http://trustbut.blogspot.com/2006/10/its-here.html
>> > > > >
>> > > > > with an l at the end.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > drat.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -dB
>> > > >
>> > > > No, a capitol L at the end.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!
>>
>> BTW. The slide show is hilarious!! It looks like Floyd's step-daughter
>> Ryan did her 7th grade science project.

 

[[email protected]]

[email protected] wrote:
>
> BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!

Not withstanding the obvious handling/chain of custody errors, if any
of the information referenced on pages 9&10, or page 20 of the
presentation is true, YOU and a whole lot of others are going to owe
Floyd a big apology.

Fred

 

[RonSonic]

On 12 Oct 2006 11:38:50 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>
>[email protected] wrote:
>>
>> BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!
>
>Not withstanding the obvious handling/chain of custody errors, if any
>of the information referenced on pages 9&10, or page 20 of the
>presentation is true, YOU and a whole lot of others are going to owe
>Floyd a big apology.

If a man cannot look at the label on a jar and write the number typed thereon
onto a piece of paper accurately I damn sure don't trust him to operate
laboratory equipment.

Ron

 

[Scott]

RonSonic wrote:
> On 12 Oct 2006 11:38:50 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>
> >
> >[email protected] wrote:
> >>
> >> BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!
> >
> >Not withstanding the obvious handling/chain of custody errors, if any
> >of the information referenced on pages 9&10, or page 20 of the
> >presentation is true, YOU and a whole lot of others are going to owe
> >Floyd a big apology.
>
> If a man cannot look at the label on a jar and write the number typed thereon
> onto a piece of paper accurately I damn sure don't trust him to operate
> laboratory equipment.
>
> Ron

My guess is that he wasn't looking at the label on the jar, he was
trying to write it down from memory. The container of **** that was
used for the second tests wasn't the same container originally used to
hold the B sample, I bet.

If you're going to frame someone, it pays to be thorough and accurate
in your fabrication of evidence.

 

[Chris]

So you're saying since there are careless transcription errors,the tests are
valid and if everything were free from careless errors it would be
indicative of a frame job?

"Scott" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> RonSonic wrote:
>> On 12 Oct 2006 11:38:50 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >[email protected] wrote:
>> >>
>> >> BTW. The slide show is hilarious!!
>> >
>> >Not withstanding the obvious handling/chain of custody errors, if any
>> >of the information referenced on pages 9&10, or page 20 of the
>> >presentation is true, YOU and a whole lot of others are going to owe
>> >Floyd a big apology.
>>
>> If a man cannot look at the label on a jar and write the number typed
>> thereon
>> onto a piece of paper accurately I damn sure don't trust him to operate
>> laboratory equipment.
>>
>> Ron
>
> My guess is that he wasn't looking at the label on the jar, he was
> trying to write it down from memory. The container of **** that was
> used for the second tests wasn't the same container originally used to
> hold the B sample, I bet.
>
> If you're going to frame someone, it pays to be thorough and accurate
> in your fabrication of evidence.
>