jhuskey said:Although a crime, prosecutions for perjury are rare, because a defendant will argue he/she merely made a mistake or misunderstood.
That's when you use the George Costanza defense... It's not a lie if you believe it.
jhuskey said:Although a crime, prosecutions for perjury are rare, because a defendant will argue he/she merely made a mistake or misunderstood.
steve said:To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised
nns1400 said:That's when you use the George Costanza defense... It's not a lie if you believe it.
limerickman said:I remember watching the so-called "miracle stage" as Landis ****** away from the field and it was around the time we had the annual influx of American xenophobes.
That very day, I told the cretins that Flandis had doped and naturally our friends took umbrage because we're just "haters"
I must dig out that post.
jhuskey said:It works for politicians too.
swampy1970 said:... and here I was thinking that you had a new found respect (page 1 of this thread) for the perjurist, liar and a cheat.
I guess if you'd take oh, 2 minutes, to actually recall what happened on that stage you'd know that Floyd lost time to the group containing the other favorites on 3 of the 5 climbs. Most of the time taken was on the first col (col des saises) as everyone had pretty much written him off. No surprise there. There aint too many guys that can stick with Floyd on the descents however, which is where he recovered all of the time lost on subsequent climbs.
Inhuman riding from Floyd or bad tactics from the rest of the field? I'd say the latter.
None of the data available shows an average power for any of the climbs at over 395watts, even for the first climb of the day - which puts him at ~ 5.8w/kg - good for a Domestic Pro but hardly earth shattering for an Internationally recognised pro like Landis. This compares with what Vaughters said about Van der Velde during his breakthrough Tour - ie he never went over a sustained 6w/kg during any road stage in the mountains.
Compare that to Armstrongs' 495 watts at the end of the final Dauphine mountain stage in 2003 - not the best numbers he's recorded, apparently. Now, those are some numbers which 'may' suggest something untoward going on beyond a steroid patch or a shot of whiskey. Contador's ride on Verbier is said, by people not looking for journalistic merit, to be ~450watts.
nns1400 said:It was great to watch, but yeah, how many times did they (during coverage) say "unbelievable!!" That's become our buzzword at home watching "incredible" and "miraculous" racing performances...yeah...UNbelievable.
After that stage, I too raised an eyebrow and thought, well I hope he didn't "do" something. It was disappointing but not surprising when he got busted. Blaming it on a shot of whiskey...also unbelievable.
Guess I'm a hater too, Lim.
But it was still a great stage and watching him divebomb those hills was pretty exciting at the time.
Can someone refresh my memory? Was it the day before that he suffered in the mountains then suddenly the next day he gained 30 minutes.limerickman said:You left out the bit where the previous, landis was sweating like a turkey approaching X-Mas day and lost a huge amount of time.
Point is, his performance was called that day as a doping performance that would resonate for years to come.
coneofsilence said:Can someone refresh my memory? Was it the day before that he suffered in the mountains then suddenly the next day he gained 30 minutes.
coneofsilence said:Can someone refresh my memory? Was it the day before that he suffered in the mountains then suddenly the next day he gained 30 minutes.
limerickman said:landis was tested after the stage and was found to have a testosterone level 400% higher than his usual reading (T/E should be 3;1, landis reading was 12/1, from memory).
nns1400 said:But it was bad tactics of other riders...
I wouldn't say peloton let him get away.limerickman said:That is true to an extent, because Landis was dead and buried judging previous stage.
The peloton let him get away, probably thinking that he would come back eventually.
Problem was, he didn't!
A truly memorable ride, even if it was tainted. One of the best rides I've ever seen, and I've been watching cycling since the 80s.limerickman said:The following day, St.-Jean-de-Maurienne - Morzine stage 17, Landis went on a solo 120km break and moved back up to 3rd place
only a minute or so off the 1st place.
sopas said:This is what a Lemond had to say about Landis:
"I believe most of Floyd Landis’s statements regarding the systemic corruption in professional cycling. I imagine from my own experiences that today he is paying a heavy price for his honesty and I support Floyd in his attempt to free himself from his past. I hope that others- fans, riders and sponsor’s embrace this as an opportunity to bring about positive change in the sport."
Considering how Landis treated Lemond a couple of years ago (the sexual abuse thing, etc), this statement from Lemond shows that he is a real gentleman who has no hate
Read more here:
Floyd Landis Admits Doping and Alleges Use by Others Greg Lemond
Andrija said:I have to notice how activity on the forum has increased since this thread started. Doping and scandal will bring more audience than races. I think that know organizers of big races too.
Regarding stage 17 in the 2006 Tour, Landis was charged and was charged to make up lost time. But he provided to us great entertainment. Riders today are also charged, but none of them dares to do something similar. It would be great if Vinokourov would lose time on Sunday and had to try something similar on, let's say, stage 19 to Aprica over Mortirolo. I've intentionally picked Vino and Mortirolo, symbolics would be complete.
Stage 20 would be great too. With all climbs over 2000 meters high and very long, with Cima Coppi (charge included in epics) and anniversary, but it's too much to expect before time trial.
Looking forward to next week.limerickman said:I prefer to talk races like you.
Looking forward to Zoncolan on Sunday
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.