>> The larger CFRP frames being too flexible is just poor engineering, and
>> has nothing to do with the inherent properties of CFRP.
>
> To reduce the flex in the larger frames requires some engineering
> enhancements because of the the inherent properties of carbon fiber.
> Apparently Trek just made the frame larger, without understanding that
> this wouldn't work.
Your information is... interesting. I've sold a number of these bikes, all
of them to people who rode other machines and were more than impressed with
how the Trek rode. Being too-flexy was never once mentioned. You could
(reasonably) argue that the sample size I refer to are those who have
actually purchased the bikes, which results in a strong bias. Except that I
don't have much of anything else to go on, because people-of-height who ride
them invariably buy them.
And the "engineering enhancements" are definitely there. The 5.5 version of
the frame doesn't use the same layup found on any of the other sizes, and
the fittings etc are unique, and specifically designed for, that size.
That's the case for every Trek size; there's nothing unusual about having to
do that. If a quality manufacturer were to build a 47cm frame the same way
they build a 58cm, the 47cm would be dramatically overbuilt (or the 58cm
underbuilt). With carbon fiber, there's no reason to do that, unless you're
trying to save money where it shouldn't be saved.
--Mike Jacoubowsky
Chain Reaction Bicycles
www.ChainReaction.com
Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA
"SMS" <
[email protected]> wrote in message
news:
[email protected]...
> Tom Sherman wrote:
>> SMS aka Steven M. Scharf wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Carbon frames that large tend to have problems of too much flex, which
>>> is what the reviews of the 64cm Madone found. Colnago seems to have
>>> solved this problem in their carbon fiber frames and they go up to 65
>>> cm.
>>>
>> The larger CFRP frames being too flexible is just poor engineering, and
>> has nothing to do with the inherent properties of CFRP.
>
> To reduce the flex in the larger frames requires some engineering
> enhancements because of the the inherent properties of carbon fiber.
> Apparently Trek just made the frame larger, without understanding that
> this wouldn't work.
>
> Colnago describes what they did at
> "http://www.colnago.com/en/catalogo2008/extremepower.php".
>
