E
Eric Murray
Guest
In article <[email protected]>, Tim Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>I wonder sometimes if weight is all that matters.
Nope. Physiological climbing ability is V02max/weight. Obviously for a given individual, since
V02max doesn't change much, the resulting number is higher if he or she is lighter.
Lance Armstrong, even the lighter post-cancer model, is still a bit heavy for a pure climber at
156lbs. But he's got a V02max that's just off the scale.
> Whenever I have been able to look at world-class stage-racing cyclists up-close (not on TV) I have
> been amazed at how compact they are. Not just slim, or low-weight, but really, really compact.
> Lots of muscle and power in a very aerodynamic shape.
Being aero doesn't affect climbing. Those guys look areo because they don't have much body fat and
unlike athletes in other sports (or even cycling sprinters) their muscles are not bulky. One thing I
have noticed recently is that a lot of top riders have fairly deep chests for their size...
presumeably they have larger lungs than average.
>It would be interesting to be able to compare great, but non hill-climbing, cyclists like Mario
>Cipollini or Sean Kelly, with the likes of Bernald Hinault, Greg Lemond, Laurent Fignon, and even
>Indurain (who, though I have only seen him on TV, did not look all that "compact"). (I don't
>mention recent cyclists, because I haven't seen them in person. Don't get around much anymore...)
Indurain was a pretty big guy for a cyclist. I'd bet his V02max was also very high.
Mario and Kelly have both won races that had hills that normal cyclists would consider to be pretty
tough. They just couldn't quite hang with the climbers on really long climbs.
Eric
>I wonder sometimes if weight is all that matters.
Nope. Physiological climbing ability is V02max/weight. Obviously for a given individual, since
V02max doesn't change much, the resulting number is higher if he or she is lighter.
Lance Armstrong, even the lighter post-cancer model, is still a bit heavy for a pure climber at
156lbs. But he's got a V02max that's just off the scale.
> Whenever I have been able to look at world-class stage-racing cyclists up-close (not on TV) I have
> been amazed at how compact they are. Not just slim, or low-weight, but really, really compact.
> Lots of muscle and power in a very aerodynamic shape.
Being aero doesn't affect climbing. Those guys look areo because they don't have much body fat and
unlike athletes in other sports (or even cycling sprinters) their muscles are not bulky. One thing I
have noticed recently is that a lot of top riders have fairly deep chests for their size...
presumeably they have larger lungs than average.
>It would be interesting to be able to compare great, but non hill-climbing, cyclists like Mario
>Cipollini or Sean Kelly, with the likes of Bernald Hinault, Greg Lemond, Laurent Fignon, and even
>Indurain (who, though I have only seen him on TV, did not look all that "compact"). (I don't
>mention recent cyclists, because I haven't seen them in person. Don't get around much anymore...)
Indurain was a pretty big guy for a cyclist. I'd bet his V02max was also very high.
Mario and Kelly have both won races that had hills that normal cyclists would consider to be pretty
tough. They just couldn't quite hang with the climbers on really long climbs.
Eric