Short answers, yes it's bad and no, your legs are probably not just weak. Pain is an important warning sign, and if it is consistent it should not be ignored.millzebub said:Ok. I have read other posts that say that most people do not encounter soreness in their legs after riding and that is good. I experience soreness in mine regularly. Is that bad? Are my legs just weak or what?
First of all, thank you for your thoughtful reply! So, yes, it is muscle soreness. I have not had a proper fit but I did do the fit calculator at competitivecyclist.com. I made adjustments based on that and they seem ok. I may be overtraining. I guess it is relative though, right? I do a lot of climbing. In fact, every time I ride I climb. Maybe I should do some flat rides or just go at a mellower pace on the climbs? I do take rest days. 2 a week. So I think I get enough rest. I have been improving steadily despite the soreness also. I have only been cycling for about a year so maybe my muscles are still getting used to the stress of riding a lot...millzebub said:Ok. I have read other posts that say that most people do not encounter soreness in their legs after riding and that is good. I experience soreness in mine regularly. Is that bad? Are my legs just weak or what?
sogood said:If you are seriously training, then you almost definitely will get sore muscles. No different to any other physical activities.
I agree with your basic post, muscles do get sore sometime, but there's almost no muscular hypertrophy associated with training for cycling unless you're doing standing starts or other high force/low velocity work. Yeah, I know I'm nitpicking but talking about hypertrophy resulting from road training leads into the whole myth that cycling power is about peak muscular strength.sogood said:I...Then your muscles will repair and hypertrophy in response to the strain placed on it. ....
I read that as well and I have been trying to eat shortly after riding but not always. That makes sense though. thanks!warriorcliff77 said:I know i'm just a rook, are you eating after your rides? I read some where on here that you should be eating within 20 min after your ride, to refuel your body so it can "repair" itself.
I recently began having a protien shake with a banana after my rides, and now i don't have the soreness the next day.
I was wondering. On my normal rides I climb a lot as I said before. I find it difficult in some areas to keep my cadence above 70rpm. Could this kind of repeated workout cause the hypertrophy (and soreness) you refer to? I read the second article and it seemed to be more extreme, with heavy loads and very low cadence, i.e. ~40rpm. I am unable to "spin" at a higher cadence because of the grade on these climbs which seems to essentially create the scenario described in these articles, albeit to a lesser extent...daveryanwyoming said:I agree with your basic post, muscles do get sore sometime, but there's almost no muscular hypertrophy associated with training for cycling unless you're doing standing starts or other high force/low velocity work. Yeah, I know I'm nitpicking but talking about hypertrophy resulting from road training leads into the whole myth that cycling power is about peak muscular strength.
Check out these articles by Andy on the subject:
http://home.earthlink.net/~acoggan/misc/id4.html
http://home.earthlink.net/~acoggan/setraining/
-Dave
millzebub said:I find it difficult in some areas to keep my cadence above 70rpm.
What's preventing you from spinning at a higher cadence? Please describe the gearing of your drivetrain.millzebub said:I am unable to "spin" at a higher cadence because of the grade on these climbs...
Sounds like you need lower gears by either changing your rear cluster or going to a compact crank if you're regularly dropping below 40 rpm on climbs. Dropping below 70 rpm on steep climbs isn't unusual, but lower gears can help you avoid that as well.millzebub said:I was wondering. On my normal rides I climb a lot as I said before. I find it difficult in some areas to keep my cadence above 70rpm. Could this kind of repeated workout cause the hypertrophy (and soreness) you refer to? I read the second article and it seemed to be more extreme, with heavy loads and very low cadence, i.e. ~40rpm. I am unable to "spin" at a higher cadence because of the grade on these climbs which seems to essentially create the scenario described in these articles, albeit to a lesser extent...
Anyway I don't think your pedaling at 40 rpm on hills is going to result in much hypertrophy or increase in muscle fiber cross section. Pedaling at any cadence on hills that get you breathing deep and steady and are long enough(ideally longer than 10 minutes) will result in increased mitochondrial and capillary densities, increased heart stroke volume and ultimately increased ability to generate power on the bike. And that's really what we're targeting, not hypertrophy and higher peak muscular forces.While SE training is popular among certain groups, peer-reviewed scientific studies demonstrating the superiority of this form of training over other, more traditional forms of training for cycling are lacking. When this question is approached from a first principles/physiological perspective, however, it seems unlikely that SE training would result in significant increases in muscle size, strength, or power, at least in a cyclist who is already performing significant amounts of training at a normal cadence. This is so because the forces generated, while higher than normal, are still too low to represent a significant overload to the pedaling musculature.
well, I think the highest combo is 39-27 on the small ring. I could be mis-stating that. I know that my easiest gear is 27.Scotty_Dog said:What's preventing you from spinning at a higher cadence? Please describe the gearing of your drivetrain.
yeah, I think I understand the article and its conclusions. I guess I was wondering if there was a connection with straining the muscles and soreness, via the lower cadence I described. My lowest cadence is in the 60's, not the 40's. I was referring to the article in that regard. I appreciate the feedback and it sounds like I have nothing to worry about. Thanks!!daveryanwyoming said:Sounds like you need lower gears by either changing your rear cluster or going to a compact crank if you're regularly dropping below 40 rpm on climbs. Dropping below 70 rpm on steep climbs isn't unusual, but lower gears can help you avoid that as well.
You might want to read that second article again. It basically says you can only really get into muscle hypertrophy on the bike with standing starts or focused seated accellerations and that the concept of Strength Endurance Training doesn't hold up under analysis because your muscles are still working at a very low percentage of their peak force even at 40 rpm on a steep hill. Here's a quote from the conclusion:[/size][/font][/color][/size][/font]Anyway I don't think your pedaling at 40 rpm on hills is going to result in much hypertrophy or increase in muscle fiber cross section. Pedaling at any cadence on hills that get you breathing deep and steady and are long enough(ideally longer than 10 minutes) will result in increased mitochondrial and capillary densities, increased heart stroke volume and ultimately increased ability to generate power on the bike. And that's really what we're targeting, not hypertrophy and higher peak muscular forces.
-Dave
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.