Lemond Ti frames

The most important thing about Lemond frames is that they have shallow seat tube angles and longish
top tube. It tends to put the rider far behind the bottom bracket. If you have long femurs, and if
you have very good flexibility in your hams and lower back, this is ok. However, if you have
shortish legs, like I do, and you are not very flexible, you'll end up with a sore lower back, and
sitting at the saddles nose.

Regarding looks and finish, I've seen one and it looks very nice.

Andres

"Tony" <[email hidden]> wrote in message news:<3ed2c174@info-int>...

Quoted message said:

Anyone have any experience with Lemond Ti frames I am interested in the Tete d Course and the
Victoire

Well.. that's the myth at least.

In reality, the seat tube angle in a typical 55 frame is 73 degrees, which is within a half degree
of a Trek, Klein, Cannondale or Litespeed Classic, as example, all of which are between 73 and 73.5.
This isn't enough a difference to "put the rider far behind the bottom bracket" You need to go to a
ST angle of 72 or so before you'd notice the difference. Also note that how much seat post offset
you have and how much saddle rail can change your positioning, so you don't have to be stting on the
nose of the saddle.

Likewise, the TT length is a shade longer at 56.5, but that's not that far off the typical for
assorted frames which run 55.5 to 56.2. My point is the geometry isn't that different that I would
let it bother you.

I just replaced a Klein Quantum frame under warrenty with a LeMond Victoire frame and have no issues
with it's slightly longer TT as it was easy enough to put a 110 stem on instead of the 120 I had on
the Klein. Note that I'm also used to a steel Heron that has a longish TT for the frame size at 57cm
effective, thus the LeMond fits fine.

Steve B.

"andres muro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

The most important thing about Lemond frames is that they have shallow seat tube angles and
longish top tube. It tends to put the rider far behind the bottom bracket. If you have long
femurs, and if you have very good flexibility in your hams and lower back, this is ok. However, if
you have shortish legs, like I do, and you are not very flexible, you'll end up with a sore lower
back, and sitting at the saddles nose.

Regarding looks and finish, I've seen one and it looks very nice.

Steve said:

In reality, the seat tube angle in a typical 55 frame is 73 degrees, which is within a half degree
of a Trek, Klein, Cannondale or Litespeed Classic, as example, all of which are between 73 and
73.5. This isn't enough a difference to "put the rider far behind the bottom bracket" You need to
go to a ST angle of 72 or so before you'd notice the difference. Also note that how much seat post
offset you have and how much saddle rail can change your positioning, so you don't have to be
stting on the nose of the saddle.

Likewise, the TT length is a shade longer at 56.5, but that's not that far off the typical for
assorted frames which run 55.5 to 56.2. My point is the geometry isn't that different that I would
let it bother you.

I should mention that the two things (slacker seat tube and longer top tube) tend to cancel each
other out.

Since we should assume the saddle ends up in the "right position" no matter WHAT the seat tube
angle, all the seat tube angle really does is to determine what point on the saddle's rails the seat
tube clamp will be. If the seat tube is 1 degree more slack (72 vs. 73 degrees), the saddle will be
moved about 1cm forward in the clamp.

This effectively "shortens" the top tube, since your butt doesn't really care about the
configuration of the tubes holding it up - only about the position of the saddle relative to the
bars and the crank.

Mark Hickey Habanero Cycles habcycles.comhabcycles.comOpen ↗ Home of the $695 ti frame

Quoted message said:

I just replaced a Klein Quantum frame under warrenty with a LeMond Victoire frame and have no
issues with it's slightly longer TT as it was easy enough to put a 110 stem on instead of the 120 I
had on the Klein. Note that I'm also used to a steel Heron that has a longish TT for the frame size
at 57cm effective, thus the LeMond fits fine.

Steve B.

"andres muro" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

The most important thing about Lemond frames is that they have shallow seat tube angles and
longish top tube. It tends to put the rider far behind the bottom bracket. If you have long
femurs, and if you have very good flexibility in your hams and lower back, this is ok. However,
if you have shortish legs, like I do, and you are not very flexible, you'll end up with a sore
lower back, and sitting at the saddles nose.

Regarding looks and finish, I've seen one and it looks very nice.

"Tony" <[email hidden]> wrote in message

Quoted message said:

Anyone have any experience with Lemond Ti frames I am interested in the

Tete

Quoted message said:

d Course and the Victoire

I have exactly 110 miles on my Victoire, but it's my 8th road bike in 15 years, so I have a pretty
good feel for how it's different then my Klein Quantums (2 versions), Heron Road, Miyata Tourer (2
versions), Peckham Tourer and Fuji Roubaix welded steel.

And I know that there's no amount of vertical compliance that I'm supposed to be able to feel....

But, it rides like stiffer steel. It feels "tighter" all around, handles a bit better then the
Heron in fast downhill's, feels like it has less "give" when accelerating - or at least less lost
power. It has less "buzz" and shock thru the fork then did the Klein, which had a Kinesis Carbon
wedge fork.

I'm running Open Pro rims, 32 spoke with Forteza 23mm tires at 125 psi. It doesn't feel a whole lot
less compliant then the Heron which has Ruffy Tuffy 27mm tires at 105-110 psi on MA3 rims. Same
saddle too. It has a bit more b-bracket flex then the Klein, but a whole lot less then the Heron.
The fork is much stiffer when standing then the Heron, which I can actually see flex.

It's a very stable bike, very predictable.

The primary difference between the Victoire and the Tete seems to be the carbon seat stays on the
Tete D Course, which also has a slightly shorter wheel base and chainstays.

Also check out reviews on roadbikereview.comdefaultcrx.aspxOpen ↗

Steve B.