Let your 7 year-old

[elmsater]

Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.

 

[gplama]

Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.

Thanks for that....

 

[Resound]

"elmsater" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
>

I never knew trolls could be completely transparent.

 

[Graeme Dods]

On 9 Apr 2006 21:29:19 -0700, elmsater wrote:

> Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.

I don't have a 7 year old, only a 2 year old. Should I let him cycle
without 3.5 helmets? We need to know now!

 

[flyingdutch]

Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.

would that sig be an anogram of "Lame Setr" ???

 

[Bean Long]

Graeme Dods wrote:
> On 9 Apr 2006 21:29:19 -0700, elmsater wrote:
>
>> Let your 7 year-old cycle without a helmet but you should have one on.
>
> I don't have a 7 year old, only a 2 year old. Should I let him cycle
> without 3.5 helmets? We need to know now!
Oh my god...I have a 2 and 3 quarter year old and a 1 year old. How
many helmets don't I need? Is this going to be on the 2005-2006 tax
return? Panic!

--
Bean

Remove "yourfinger" before replying

 

[cfsmtb]

would that sig be an anogram of "Lame Setr" ???

boxtard alert