ok, see... that was funny, Your words (this time) weren't designed to (or were not apt to ) belittle
a remark made in innocent ignorance. They were spot on relevant, and in the spirit of the original
post. Good job.
"Tom Sherman" <[email protected]
> wrote in message news:[email protected]
> baronn1 wrote:
> > While I enjoy your off beat sense of humour, and while you often do miss
> > mark on your first pass at things, I wasn't defending you. I finally
> > didn't say "Why bother?" when my fingers flew to the keyboard in
> > one of Egberts highly annoying, self important, un-invited, irrelevant,
> > boosting, "hey look at me" snide little smarter-than-thou corrections,
> > the myriad of examples of same in the past.
> Some people would consider pointing out that a post is "highly annoying, self important,
> un-invited, irrelevant, ego boosting, "hey look at me" and snide little smarter-than-thou" is even
> more highly annoying, self important, un-invited, irrelevant, ego boosting, "hey look at me" and
> snide little smarter-than-thou than the original post.
> Tom Sherman - Quad Cities USA (Illinois side) RANS "Wavewind" and Rocket, Earth Cycles Sunset and
> Dragonflyer, Sidewalker Micro, Trek 6000