B
Bob Schwartz
Guest
Monkeyhillcs <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Bob Schwartz [email protected]
> <<That's 3 cops/field, right?>>
> No. 2 cops per field, and a ton of motorcycle officials. Delaware doesn't have motorocycle state
> troopers.
>>>But that is a level of expense that is an option for only a tiny
> percentage of races even if the required number of motorcycle cops is available, which in most
> cases is not. There is no police jurisdiction that I can think of as even being a remote
> possibility for a race that I might put on that even has moto cops and that includes state
> troopers. And since a rolling enclosure isn't really an option with cops in squad cars>>>
> Wrong, see above. I think that most East Coast races with rolling enclosures don't have motor
> police. I can think of only FU-philly and Tour deWarsaw that have motorcycle police.
OK, maybe I'm unclear on exactly what you guys mean by 'rolling enclosure'.
My understanding is that a rolling enclosure has guys on motorcycles constantly leapfrogging the
field. A guy on a motor controls an intersection ahead of the race and holds it until the race
passes through. They then pass the follow caravan and field to control the next intersection. You
need a bunch of guys doing this and since they may be controlling intersections where the race does
not have the right of way they need to be cops.
So do you guys only use courses that don't ever run stop signs? Or do the cops not mind people
that are not cops acting like cops if there are real cops up in front of the race? If you can
swing that then you must have a real silver tongue, I'll bet you get laid more in a week than
Ku... oh never mind.
It also sounds like you're running a single field. One of my points was that the expense and effort
gets much higher if you are doing this with 5 or 6 concurrent fields like most of the local USAC
road races around here do. There are a lots of things that are possible for single field races that
drop into the NFW category once you start talking women and cat 3s, 4/5s, multiple levels of
masters...
> There are a lot of officials with motorcycles. Or you could do like Bill Laudien and shut the
> road down in one direction. Then you don't really need that many mobile police.
If you guys have a ton of motor officials available then you are really lucky. Authority figures,
cops or officials, are easily the most valuable thing to have when running a safe race. We had two
local guys a number of years ago, neither is currently available. So a lot of races here will do
something similar with lots of officials in cars, enough to put an official behind each field. But
its a ton harder to control a race from a car than a motorcycle. You can't easily and safely get in
people's faces in a car the way you can on a motor. I wish we had more motor refs.
Is Laudien taking a road that people actually want to drive on during the race? He must have powers
of persuasion that explains why he doesn't have time to post here much anymore.
Bob Schwartz [email protected]
> From: Bob Schwartz [email protected]
> <<That's 3 cops/field, right?>>
> No. 2 cops per field, and a ton of motorcycle officials. Delaware doesn't have motorocycle state
> troopers.
>>>But that is a level of expense that is an option for only a tiny
> percentage of races even if the required number of motorcycle cops is available, which in most
> cases is not. There is no police jurisdiction that I can think of as even being a remote
> possibility for a race that I might put on that even has moto cops and that includes state
> troopers. And since a rolling enclosure isn't really an option with cops in squad cars>>>
> Wrong, see above. I think that most East Coast races with rolling enclosures don't have motor
> police. I can think of only FU-philly and Tour deWarsaw that have motorcycle police.
OK, maybe I'm unclear on exactly what you guys mean by 'rolling enclosure'.
My understanding is that a rolling enclosure has guys on motorcycles constantly leapfrogging the
field. A guy on a motor controls an intersection ahead of the race and holds it until the race
passes through. They then pass the follow caravan and field to control the next intersection. You
need a bunch of guys doing this and since they may be controlling intersections where the race does
not have the right of way they need to be cops.
So do you guys only use courses that don't ever run stop signs? Or do the cops not mind people
that are not cops acting like cops if there are real cops up in front of the race? If you can
swing that then you must have a real silver tongue, I'll bet you get laid more in a week than
Ku... oh never mind.
It also sounds like you're running a single field. One of my points was that the expense and effort
gets much higher if you are doing this with 5 or 6 concurrent fields like most of the local USAC
road races around here do. There are a lots of things that are possible for single field races that
drop into the NFW category once you start talking women and cat 3s, 4/5s, multiple levels of
masters...
> There are a lot of officials with motorcycles. Or you could do like Bill Laudien and shut the
> road down in one direction. Then you don't really need that many mobile police.
If you guys have a ton of motor officials available then you are really lucky. Authority figures,
cops or officials, are easily the most valuable thing to have when running a safe race. We had two
local guys a number of years ago, neither is currently available. So a lot of races here will do
something similar with lots of officials in cars, enough to put an official behind each field. But
its a ton harder to control a race from a car than a motorcycle. You can't easily and safely get in
people's faces in a car the way you can on a motor. I wish we had more motor refs.
Is Laudien taking a road that people actually want to drive on during the race? He must have powers
of persuasion that explains why he doesn't have time to post here much anymore.
Bob Schwartz [email protected]